Cascade Crew Forum Index Cascade Crew
Message Forums
 
 GarageGarage   1/4 Mile Table1/4 Mile Table   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

T56
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Back Porch
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nonsensekid20
Member


Joined: 30 Sep 2010
Posts: 490


1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:04 pm    Post subject: T56 Reply with quote

Good price for full kit? And I'm not swapping from an automatic, so do you think they would just sell me the parts I need?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some 5 years ago I paid $1100 shipped for an LS1 t56.
That was the trans, stock shifter, and ls1 bell housing.


What full kit do you mean? LS1? LT1?

_________________
A redline a day keeps the carbon away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
nonsensekid20
Member


Joined: 30 Sep 2010
Posts: 490


1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I'm special.. Rolling Eyes http://www.hawksthirdgenparts.com/camarofirebird93-97lt16speedconversion-1-2.aspx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that's the picture of an LS1 trans.


Personally I wouldn't go LT1 route unless you have an LT1 engine. The T56 route costs about the same, AND is cheaper in the long run in terms of flywheel and clutch replacement.

If you have a T5 now, all you need is the LS1 Trans, McLeod adapter plate, McLeod pilot bushing, cross member, and shorten the driveline.


IIRC for the LT1 you'll need a conversion flywheel, lt1 clutch, clutch fork, bell housing, crossmember, slave at least, and maybe driveline work. Flywheel and clutch alone is over $500.

I've wrote about this many times here.

_________________
A redline a day keeps the carbon away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Alphius
Peanut


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 2429
Location: Grand Mound

1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With a 1-piece RMS the LT1 flywheel should bolt right up, therefore negating the need for the conversion flywheel. Bolting an LT1 T56 to a 1-piece RMS SBC is just the same as bolting one to an actual LT1.

Aside from that detail, I completely agree with everything else Paul said. Smile With a T5 setup already and a 2-piece RMS the LS1 T56 is way cheaper overall.

_________________
84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 2:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alphius wrote:
With a 1-piece RMS the LT1 flywheel should bolt right up, therefore negating the need for the conversion flywheel. Bolting an LT1 T56 to a 1-piece RMS SBC is just the same as bolting one to an actual LT1.

Aside from that detail, I completely agree with everything else Paul said. Smile With a T5 setup already and a 2-piece RMS the LS1 T56 is way cheaper overall.


Clutches are cheaper for a std v8 thirdgen than LT1 as well.

I was under the distinct impression the LT1 flywheel's friction surface was in a different place from that of a gen 1.

_________________
A redline a day keeps the carbon away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Alphius
Peanut


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 2429
Location: Grand Mound

1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Twilightoptics wrote:
Alphius wrote:
With a 1-piece RMS the LT1 flywheel should bolt right up, therefore negating the need for the conversion flywheel. Bolting an LT1 T56 to a 1-piece RMS SBC is just the same as bolting one to an actual LT1.

Aside from that detail, I completely agree with everything else Paul said. Smile With a T5 setup already and a 2-piece RMS the LS1 T56 is way cheaper overall.


Clutches are cheaper for a std v8 thirdgen than LT1 as well.

I was under the distinct impression the LT1 flywheel's friction surface was in a different place from that of a gen 1.


Thirdgen clutches are cheaper and stronger than LT1, true.

LT1 flywheel's friction surface is different, that's why you use the LT1 clutch, PP, throwout bearing, and slave cylinder when you swap in the LT1 T56. It goes in as a package and it all works together. Wink

LS1 setup is way better anyway, but oddly enough (Laughing) it can be cheaper and easier to find an LT1 T56 so with a 1-piece RMS motor it's a pretty easy swap and can save a bunch of money.

_________________
84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Twilightoptics wrote:
I was under the distinct impression the LT1 flywheel's friction surface was in a different place from that of a gen 1.


Stock LT1 flywheel can be used on a 1-piece gen one motor. I did it on my old IROC. Wink

To the OP: These guys are steering you right, dude. I did an LT1 style conversion back when that was the cool thing to do. Final cost was around two grand and I had an inferior setup to one like Paul had.

Also, Hawks if a f**king ripoff. Don't even consider any price you get from those crooks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

aaron_sK wrote:
Twilightoptics wrote:
I was under the distinct impression the LT1 flywheel's friction surface was in a different place from that of a gen 1.




Got it. My research kinda stopped in my swap when I found out how much the 2 piece rear flywheel was. I said F-That.

And if you have a buddy that can weld, you can save some coin on the cross member.

Sure glad I saved my tubular torque arm, cross member and LS1T56..... As soon as I get my mazda where I want it it'll be turdgen time again.

_________________
A redline a day keeps the carbon away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
charlie6178
Member


Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Posts: 300
Location: Portland

1991 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

as far as the flywheels go, theres one more option

if you have access to a lathe big enough to chuck up a flywheel, you can use a 4 jaw chuck, and dial indicate the center bore of the flywheel and go in with a boring bar and take the needed material out of the flywheel to fit over the early (2 piece main) crankshaft. i have personally done it, so i know it works.

my first T56 swap in my old 83 T/A i used the centerforce conversion flywheel which was $300 give or take and a stock LT1 clutch, and stock LT1 hydraulics worked flawlessly. then we did the same exact swap with an 84 Z28 and used the factory LT1 flywheel that i modified and we had ZERO issues with it.

if i end up using the T56 rather than the ZF6 in my 92 camaro, i'll definitally just modify the stock LT1 flywheel again.

_________________
1992 Camaro 1LE Z28
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
BluFbdy
Member


Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 915
Location: Port Orchard WA

1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 1:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Originally I aid about 1100 shipped for my ls t56 and then bought the crossmember from hawks, and stupidly ended up with the LT in a trade, got a pro 5.0 and new surfaced flywheel out of the deal, honestly nick I'd heed the warnings and go ls on this, the adapter plate is a bit much bit you can find them cheap, you just need to be ersitant, also doesn't the ls need the driveshaft shortened? Never looked into how much that would cost but its probably better than a clutch for an LT lol
_________________
If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adapter plate is only about $200.

Driveline shorten is about $200.


I have an adapter plate and scatter shield. Al was interested in it some months ago but haven't heard since.

_________________
A redline a day keeps the carbon away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It costs that much for a shortened driveshaft?? I think my new custom shaft was about there.
_________________
E30
86 RS - 7.4L V8 SOLD
89 RS - 3.25L V6 REMOVED
89 RS - 5.7L LT1 SOLD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
BluFbdy
Member


Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 915
Location: Port Orchard WA

1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There ya go, modify the old or go custom lol
_________________
If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
charlie6178
Member


Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Posts: 300
Location: Portland

1991 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The driveline does not need to be shortened whatsoever with an lt1 T56. Idk why people think its a big deal. it's literally a bolt in swap that you need a conversion flywheel, or stock one machined inside. It's not rocket science.
_________________
1992 Camaro 1LE Z28
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Al Hasse
Member


Joined: 19 Nov 2005
Posts: 4379
Location: Bremerton, WA

1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Twilightoptics wrote:
I have an adapter plate and scatter shield. Al was interested in it some months ago but haven't heard since.


Still trying to scratch up funds. Had to have heater core replaced and wasn't going to do it in the driveway, teporarily wiped out my funding. I may have to wait until after the Holidays, but if you can get rid of them before then, that's OK.

_________________
92 Camaro
89 Camaro
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

charlie6178 wrote:
The driveline does not need to be shortened whatsoever with an lt1 T56. Idk why people think its a big deal. it's literally a bolt in swap that you need a conversion flywheel, or stock one machined inside. It's not rocket science.


I personally don't like the extra coin in longevity with clutch costs.

Plus the pull clutch I don't like from years of working with transmissions.

_________________
A redline a day keeps the carbon away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
nonsensekid20
Member


Joined: 30 Sep 2010
Posts: 490


1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 8:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I don't have to swap my clutch id really love that. Otherwise I'd be throwing out a centerforce with like 2k on it. The LS trans would bolt to my motor with the stock bell housing? I think I saw an ls trans on CL for like 1700. So then all I would need is the crossmember and to shorten the driveshaft correct? I've got a carbed motor. Not lt or ls. I don't know what it classifies as. Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
83Z28BlackBetty
Bam-Ba-Lam


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 2083
Location: Aloha

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah the lt1 style is an easy bolt up swap IF you have a one piece rear main seal. Once I saw the cost of the adapter plate, I found it was worth it to just swap the entire lt1. Smile

-jake

_________________
1983 Z-28 5.7 LT1, T56, Headman headers, BW 9 Bolt Posi Disc, WS6 suspension
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Al Hasse wrote:
Had to have heater core replaced


Should have brought it out here Al. Would have been peanuts for me after the Volvo. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Back Porch All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group