| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nonsensekid20 Member
Joined: 30 Sep 2010 Posts: 490
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:04 pm Post subject: T56 |
|
|
| Good price for full kit? And I'm not swapping from an automatic, so do you think they would just sell me the parts I need? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some 5 years ago I paid $1100 shipped for an LS1 t56.
That was the trans, stock shifter, and ls1 bell housing.
What full kit do you mean? LS1? LT1? _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nonsensekid20 Member
Joined: 30 Sep 2010 Posts: 490
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think that's the picture of an LS1 trans.
Personally I wouldn't go LT1 route unless you have an LT1 engine. The T56 route costs about the same, AND is cheaper in the long run in terms of flywheel and clutch replacement.
If you have a T5 now, all you need is the LS1 Trans, McLeod adapter plate, McLeod pilot bushing, cross member, and shorten the driveline.
IIRC for the LT1 you'll need a conversion flywheel, lt1 clutch, clutch fork, bell housing, crossmember, slave at least, and maybe driveline work. Flywheel and clutch alone is over $500.
I've wrote about this many times here. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alphius Peanut

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With a 1-piece RMS the LT1 flywheel should bolt right up, therefore negating the need for the conversion flywheel. Bolting an LT1 T56 to a 1-piece RMS SBC is just the same as bolting one to an actual LT1.
Aside from that detail, I completely agree with everything else Paul said. With a T5 setup already and a 2-piece RMS the LS1 T56 is way cheaper overall. _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Alphius wrote: | With a 1-piece RMS the LT1 flywheel should bolt right up, therefore negating the need for the conversion flywheel. Bolting an LT1 T56 to a 1-piece RMS SBC is just the same as bolting one to an actual LT1.
Aside from that detail, I completely agree with everything else Paul said. With a T5 setup already and a 2-piece RMS the LS1 T56 is way cheaper overall. |
Clutches are cheaper for a std v8 thirdgen than LT1 as well.
I was under the distinct impression the LT1 flywheel's friction surface was in a different place from that of a gen 1. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alphius Peanut

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Twilightoptics wrote: | | Alphius wrote: | With a 1-piece RMS the LT1 flywheel should bolt right up, therefore negating the need for the conversion flywheel. Bolting an LT1 T56 to a 1-piece RMS SBC is just the same as bolting one to an actual LT1.
Aside from that detail, I completely agree with everything else Paul said. With a T5 setup already and a 2-piece RMS the LS1 T56 is way cheaper overall. |
Clutches are cheaper for a std v8 thirdgen than LT1 as well.
I was under the distinct impression the LT1 flywheel's friction surface was in a different place from that of a gen 1. |
Thirdgen clutches are cheaper and stronger than LT1, true.
LT1 flywheel's friction surface is different, that's why you use the LT1 clutch, PP, throwout bearing, and slave cylinder when you swap in the LT1 T56. It goes in as a package and it all works together.
LS1 setup is way better anyway, but oddly enough ( ) it can be cheaper and easier to find an LT1 T56 so with a 1-piece RMS motor it's a pretty easy swap and can save a bunch of money. _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Twilightoptics wrote: | | I was under the distinct impression the LT1 flywheel's friction surface was in a different place from that of a gen 1. |
Stock LT1 flywheel can be used on a 1-piece gen one motor. I did it on my old IROC.
To the OP: These guys are steering you right, dude. I did an LT1 style conversion back when that was the cool thing to do. Final cost was around two grand and I had an inferior setup to one like Paul had.
Also, Hawks if a f**king ripoff. Don't even consider any price you get from those crooks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aaron_sK wrote: | | Twilightoptics wrote: | | I was under the distinct impression the LT1 flywheel's friction surface was in a different place from that of a gen 1. |
|
Got it. My research kinda stopped in my swap when I found out how much the 2 piece rear flywheel was. I said F-That.
And if you have a buddy that can weld, you can save some coin on the cross member.
Sure glad I saved my tubular torque arm, cross member and LS1T56..... As soon as I get my mazda where I want it it'll be turdgen time again. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
charlie6178 Member

Joined: 19 Feb 2008 Posts: 300 Location: Portland
1991 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
as far as the flywheels go, theres one more option
if you have access to a lathe big enough to chuck up a flywheel, you can use a 4 jaw chuck, and dial indicate the center bore of the flywheel and go in with a boring bar and take the needed material out of the flywheel to fit over the early (2 piece main) crankshaft. i have personally done it, so i know it works.
my first T56 swap in my old 83 T/A i used the centerforce conversion flywheel which was $300 give or take and a stock LT1 clutch, and stock LT1 hydraulics worked flawlessly. then we did the same exact swap with an 84 Z28 and used the factory LT1 flywheel that i modified and we had ZERO issues with it.
if i end up using the T56 rather than the ZF6 in my 92 camaro, i'll definitally just modify the stock LT1 flywheel again. _________________ 1992 Camaro 1LE Z28 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BluFbdy Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 915 Location: Port Orchard WA
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Originally I aid about 1100 shipped for my ls t56 and then bought the crossmember from hawks, and stupidly ended up with the LT in a trade, got a pro 5.0 and new surfaced flywheel out of the deal, honestly nick I'd heed the warnings and go ls on this, the adapter plate is a bit much bit you can find them cheap, you just need to be ersitant, also doesn't the ls need the driveshaft shortened? Never looked into how much that would cost but its probably better than a clutch for an LT lol _________________ If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Adapter plate is only about $200.
Driveline shorten is about $200.
I have an adapter plate and scatter shield. Al was interested in it some months ago but haven't heard since. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BluFbdy Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 915 Location: Port Orchard WA
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There ya go, modify the old or go custom lol _________________ If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
charlie6178 Member

Joined: 19 Feb 2008 Posts: 300 Location: Portland
1991 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The driveline does not need to be shortened whatsoever with an lt1 T56. Idk why people think its a big deal. it's literally a bolt in swap that you need a conversion flywheel, or stock one machined inside. It's not rocket science. _________________ 1992 Camaro 1LE Z28 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Al Hasse Member

Joined: 19 Nov 2005 Posts: 4379 Location: Bremerton, WA
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Twilightoptics wrote: | | I have an adapter plate and scatter shield. Al was interested in it some months ago but haven't heard since. |
Still trying to scratch up funds. Had to have heater core replaced and wasn't going to do it in the driveway, teporarily wiped out my funding. I may have to wait until after the Holidays, but if you can get rid of them before then, that's OK. _________________ 92 Camaro
89 Camaro
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| charlie6178 wrote: | | The driveline does not need to be shortened whatsoever with an lt1 T56. Idk why people think its a big deal. it's literally a bolt in swap that you need a conversion flywheel, or stock one machined inside. It's not rocket science. |
I personally don't like the extra coin in longevity with clutch costs.
Plus the pull clutch I don't like from years of working with transmissions. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nonsensekid20 Member
Joined: 30 Sep 2010 Posts: 490
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I don't have to swap my clutch id really love that. Otherwise I'd be throwing out a centerforce with like 2k on it. The LS trans would bolt to my motor with the stock bell housing? I think I saw an ls trans on CL for like 1700. So then all I would need is the crossmember and to shorten the driveshaft correct? I've got a carbed motor. Not lt or ls. I don't know what it classifies as.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam

Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah the lt1 style is an easy bolt up swap IF you have a one piece rear main seal. Once I saw the cost of the adapter plate, I found it was worth it to just swap the entire lt1.
-jake _________________ 1983 Z-28 5.7 LT1, T56, Headman headers, BW 9 Bolt Posi Disc, WS6 suspension
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Al Hasse wrote: | | Had to have heater core replaced |
Should have brought it out here Al. Would have been peanuts for me after the Volvo.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|