| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
'92 camaro boss Member

Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 410
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:59 pm Post subject: Let's build an engine. |
|
|
Alright, so since i'm a newbe to all of this stuff, i'd like to ask some people who know what's going on.
I were to hand you a 350 block, 4 bolt main, engine's all there, but currently has heads that are garbage, and it's from a 78 chevy pick up.
I want to get about 400hp outta it, give or take a bit.
what parts would you select, links or part number's are more than welcome. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sticking by my advice from the other thread.
I would go with an Air-Gap ( Edelbrock doesn't make one for a big block Ford, or I would have one on mine )
Recurve the HEI dist. MSD makes a cheapo kit with springs and weights for Chevies (but not Fords )
Is this an auto car? If so, I'd think Holley 600 vac. sec. I've run the one on mine up to around 6200rpm with a good Holley pump and regulator, and it does fantastic. People overcarb way to much IMHO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with the too much carb statement however I personally do not like the vacuum secondary carbs. They just always have the split second delay to them for the time it takes the secondary butterflies to kick open.... I have done everything and some to them to try to eliminate this and I can make them just about perfect...... but not perfect compared to mechanical secondaries.
First thing is first what is your budget? Without knowing that it is hard to give you a combination.
If your really strapped for cash you may not even be able to achieve 400hp unless you have some good parts scored for really cheap.
I am a firm believer in building overkill into a motor since everyone would like to get that little bit more power later on when they have extra cash to spend on it again! _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Outlaw28 Member
Joined: 06 Aug 2009 Posts: 299 Location: where ever i want to be
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| id just get a regular performer rpm and save yourself a bunch of money becuz the gain from rpm air gap to regular rpm is not worth the price for the airgap...id go with some hooker headers...im currently getting the parts and aiming for the same horsepower range..but i mainly want the tq cuz mines pretty much all street car...chevy performance did a series of articles with my exact motor...so im sorta replicating it...get yourself some vortec heads and put some beehive springs on them...make sure the intake is the 8 bolt vortec design...some full roller tip rockers 1.6:1 ratio and either a comp cams energy extreme 262 or 268 cam...that should get you close maybe there...every motor is different...deff make sure you have a good ignition system like previously said...im planning to stick with the stock Qjet for now...for a mix of performance and gas mileage...of course im sure some of the experts here might have something else to say...im just telling you from all the research and reading ive done...but vortec heads seem to be the best bang for the buck street heads...remember dont aim for peak hp...or peak tq...go for usable hp and tq numbers across the rpm range...specially in the mid range which you will mostly see on the street |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Its all in the heads. You will not make a legit 400hp, without a really good set of heads, or some really good port job.
The true test, is to look at the guys here that are actualy making that kind of power (or higher). Look at their motors, you will see a pretty common thread. Good heads. The rest of it comes down to picking a cam for the RPM range your bottom end can handle, and tuning it to run well (be it carb or EFI). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Dewey316 wrote: | Its all in the heads. You will not make a legit 400hp, without a really good set of heads, or some really good port job.
The true test, is to look at the guys here that are actualy making that kind of power (or higher). Look at their motors, you will see a pretty common thread. Good heads. The rest of it comes down to picking a cam for the RPM range your bottom end can handle, and tuning it to run well (be it carb or EFI). |
Yup.
You looking at 400RWHP? That's REALLY hard to do with a 350 N/A and streetable. Sure 13:1, 18º heads, and race gas will do it.
You need to have the motor line honed and done with main cap studs.
You need everything balanced, and I'd be looking into atleast aftermarket crank/rods. You'll need some kind of hyper or forged piston. The stock cast stuff, you're riding on borrowed time. I'm at the limit of cast stuff right now and I'm only 330RWHP.
Then I'd be getting a set of AFR eliminators. Air Gap manifold, Holley DP carb, and probably a Big voodoo cam. Plus roller rockers and all that lighter weight valve train stuff to handle the 6000-7000RPM you'll need to turn to get the motor to make that kinda power.
Then don't forget a fuel pump and system that can handle that kinda power, and a good exhaust. Dual 3" is ideal at this level. It's not all the motor that makes the power. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Outlaw28 Member
Joined: 06 Aug 2009 Posts: 299 Location: where ever i want to be
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i didnt catch part where he said wheel hp...thought he just meant at the crank...but yeah the heads are the key to it all |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Outlaw28 wrote: | | i didnt catch part where he said wheel hp...thought he just meant at the crank...but yeah the heads are the key to it all |
400 crank is pretty easy, but still like all have said.... Heads/Cam/Intake/Exhaust. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Schultzy89GTA M.R.A. (11sec Club)

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 4417 Location: Gresham, OR
1989 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| izcain wrote: | | First thing is first what is your budget? Without knowing that it is hard to give you a combination. |
What he said. Lots of ways to skin the SBC kitty but need to know what you have to work with AND what you would like to do with it. Is 400hp a number to hit a particular goal or a number that you pulled out of your... hat?
Cheers,
-Schultzy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Outlaw28 Member
Joined: 06 Aug 2009 Posts: 299 Location: where ever i want to be
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Twilightoptics wrote: | | Outlaw28 wrote: | | i didnt catch part where he said wheel hp...thought he just meant at the crank...but yeah the heads are the key to it all |
400 crank is pretty easy, but still like all have said.... Heads/Cam/Intake/Exhaust. |
yeah i know 400 at crank pretty easy...made more sense he said that then wheel hp...if you plan to drive in it daily on the street 400 at the crank makes more sense then 500 at the crank...im going for 400 at the crank...ganna put some modified vortec heads on...edelbrock rpm intake...hooker 2055's with air delete...and some fuller roller tip rockers and prolly a 268 xtreme comp cam figured that keep me happy for a few years..and get me close if not over 400 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Outlaw28 wrote: | | Twilightoptics wrote: | | Outlaw28 wrote: | | i didnt catch part where he said wheel hp...thought he just meant at the crank...but yeah the heads are the key to it all |
400 crank is pretty easy, but still like all have said.... Heads/Cam/Intake/Exhaust. |
yeah i know 400 at crank pretty easy...made more sense he said that then wheel hp...if you plan to drive in it daily on the street 400 at the crank makes more sense then 500 at the crank...im going for 400 at the crank...ganna put some modified vortec heads on...edelbrock rpm intake...hooker 2055's with air delete...and some fuller roller tip rockers and prolly a 268 xtreme comp cam figured that keep me happy for a few years..and get me close if not over 400 |
I think your gonna find that the 2055's are going to be a lil on the small side for primary size. As well as that cam is going to be a little to tame to make the peak power your looking for although your mid range will be fairly strong in that motor.
I would strongly think about stroking the motor. Building the stroker is only a tad more money then building the standard 350 but the extra cubes will make a world of difference for a street able torque monster! But once again we need to know the kind of funding that is going to be spent on this.......... _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Outlaw28 wrote: | | Twilightoptics wrote: | | Outlaw28 wrote: | | i didnt catch part where he said wheel hp...thought he just meant at the crank...but yeah the heads are the key to it all |
400 crank is pretty easy, but still like all have said.... Heads/Cam/Intake/Exhaust. |
yeah i know 400 at crank pretty easy...made more sense he said that then wheel hp...if you plan to drive in it daily on the street 400 at the crank makes more sense then 500 at the crank...im going for 400 at the crank...ganna put some modified vortec heads on...edelbrock rpm intake...hooker 2055's with air delete...and some fuller roller tip rockers and prolly a 268 xtreme comp cam figured that keep me happy for a few years..and get me close if not over 400 |
Not enough cam to get there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Outlaw28 Member
Joined: 06 Aug 2009 Posts: 299 Location: where ever i want to be
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ill take yalls advice you got more experience in this field then i do...i just going by the all the research ive done...but reading doesnt quit cut it when it comes to actual numbers...i would like to get long tubes but...cost and ground clearance are big issues...and id love to stroke it but it cost more then just a lil money to stroke it...got to bore and clearance the block buy the crank and pistons...thats more money right there...i dont know about you guys but i dont make enough to even consider that as an option...ive seen ppl gettin 400 with 2055's with no issues...im sure if they had long tubes theyd free up some more power...but it can be done...even seen ppl do it with stock manifolds...the cam area...well like i said previously im not really aiming for top end...you dont drive in top end very often on the street...more in the mid to low range...i want strong mid...id like to rev to about 6000rpm...but 5500 be fine right now i only go to 5000...cuz redline at 5100 with my stock cam and valvetrain...sorry to high jack the thread...i was just trying to give some helpful advice from what i know... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shorty headers with 1 5/8" primaries are just dandy. As long as they have atleast 2.5" collectors. 3" would be ideal. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was referring to the original poster about stroking the engine. _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Outlaw28 Member
Joined: 06 Aug 2009 Posts: 299 Location: where ever i want to be
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| oh ok sorry...been out of it all day...working two jobs now and its draining the heck out of me...and im about to go to bed... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|