Cascade Crew Forum Index Cascade Crew
Message Forums
 
 GarageGarage   1/4 Mile Table1/4 Mile Table   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Rear Axle debate.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
91RSVert
Member


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 2736
Location: AR

1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:28 am    Post subject: Rear Axle debate. Reply with quote

So when I got this vert I swapped in the rear axle from my v6 that I THOUGHT had a 3.23 peg leg. I noticed no difference in power that everyone speaks of when swapping gears. hum....

So while trying to correct my speedo, I have figured out that is still a 2.73 axle ( Confused on how that got put in a v6 car).

So now I have some thoughts bouncing around in the brain... my biggest obstical is money and tools.

1. Install the used set of 3.42's I have with my slp LSD.(dont have tools, knowledge, 3.42 may be to steep for my intended use)
2. Get junkyard unit/drum for 200+core and swap.
3. Wait, hunt, find v8 rear disk and pay more cash. Swap hoses, cables, etc.


Also, what years did they change the splines and to the better rear disk?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

All the V6 camaro's I've ever hunted down in the 86-89 era have all had open 3.42 rear gears. There should be any difference between V6 and V8 rear ends except for one, 26 or 28 spline axles. With 28 supposedly being stronger. So if you have a limited slip unit (I assume cone/clutch Auburn?) count the teeth on the spider gears. The 28's are also a bit thicker and don't physically fit into the 26 spline case. Fortunatly I lucked out on mine and found a 26 spline auburn 2 series to match my 26 spline axles.

3.42 is a pretty low gear when doing performance stuff. 3.73 would be a minimum. Do a little math and figure out what RPM you'll be at with a given rear gear. My V6 is only at 2500-2700 at 70mph with 4.11's and lots of people put 4.11's behind their V8's. Not to mention gears are cheap. $150 from Richmond.

_________________
E30
86 RS - 7.4L V8 SOLD
89 RS - 3.25L V6 REMOVED
89 RS - 5.7L LT1 SOLD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
91RSVert
Member


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 2736
Location: AR

1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I knew the splines were different depending upon the year. Didnt know when they changed though.


Gears from my readings..
v8's had 2.73/auto or 3.08/t5
v6 91/92 was 3.23/auto or 3.42/t5
v6 pre 89 was 3.42/auto/trans


I want to beable to cruise down the highway and not kill my milage. I'm thinking 3.42 may be to much for that. The 3.23 was just one step above what the car should have. Then also later if/when I kill this t5, I want to go back to 4l65e or 4l80e... so then I "should" go back down to 2.73.

Whats the formula to figure rpms out???
tire dia... 26.18
axle gear... ??
trans gear.... .73 od?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.wallaceracing.com/gear-speed.php

Do a quick search for WC-T5 ratios, I think I just posted them up somewhere. Initial calculations for a 4.11 with 0.70 rear has the engine at about 2500. And you'll have low 60' times!

My initial views of rear end ratios has been skewed by having automatics. The torque converter makes the engine always spin at a minimum of 2-3k, no matter what rear is in the back. Messes with your head man!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
91RSVert
Member


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 2736
Location: AR

1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 9:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cool link. Thanks!

Confirms I do infact have a 2.73. That is so close its scary! Shocked

Confirms 3.42 is to much for the interstate. So its gonna have to be 3.23 or 3.08.

Also searching, I have found...

3.08 lower is series 2. So basically 95% of v8's had series 2
3.23 higher is series 3. So all v6s were series 3

90+ is 28 spline
pre88 is 26 spline

Slp's/zexel pull out is series 3 28spline.

So I'm back to where I am now. No matter what axle, I'll have to pay someone to swap gears n carriers. Unless I can just "happen" to find a 3.08 posi/disk and just be happy with stock.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 9:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

damn dude, what RPM do you want to be pushing at 70mph? At a 3.08 you'lll barely be idling? I have 3.08's in my LT1 and its too low. I'd much rather 3.42 or 3.73 at a minimum. Just for fun I might put my 4.11's in it for a day or two Very Happy

I have other useful calculator pages if you want them. Maybe we should all start a bookmarks thread? I have tons and they're all organized. If you want jay, I'll send you mine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
91RSVert
Member


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 2736
Location: AR

1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 9:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was aiming for 60 and 80mph Cool

3.42/80mph is est 2600/2700mph. That is going to suck my gas.

3.23/80mph is est 2300/2400. Better, but still pushing. This would be nice around town though... which is most of my driving. 70 would be 2200, which may be what I have to settle for.

3.08/80mph is 2100/2200. Nice, but not great for around town. But better then the 2.73 I got now.


there is a 92 model disk/posi on ebay right now.. 4hrs way, likely 2.73 though Sad . finger....... is........ twitching.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

2.73 would be a 2 series carrier that you could bring up to your 3.08 with new gears. Just putting that out there.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
91RSVert
Member


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 2736
Location: AR

1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yea, but gotta pay someone to do it Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That part can get expensive. If you get a new axle though they would probably drop the price down if you brought it in a truck bed. They tend to be happier and more inclined to be cheaper if they can set the gears on a bench instead of the ground.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rjmcgee
The Hammer


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2328



PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your going to see almost no performance gain going from 2.73 to 3.08, it's just a real small change for the $'s you will shell out.

I think 3.42's would be a nice trade of performance and $'s.

Do you know what overdrive ratio your T5 is? Both Jenn and I have the .63 5th gear. I cruise 2000 rpm @ 60ish with 4.10 gears.

On Jenn's Firebird we went from a LG4/700R4/2.73 combo to a LG4/T5/3.73 combo and she was still getting 22-24 mpg on the freeway when we drove up to Washington for Cows last summer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah, I agree, its not worth bothering with 3.08's. I have 3.42s in my car, and I got 32mpg on a trip last summer. 3.42's are a pretty good mix, it will give you a gain, but isn't so steep that you can't cruise and still get good gas milage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
91RSVert
Member


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 2736
Location: AR

1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, the axle I found is mine Very Happy , gotta go get it sunday.

GU5/G80, with disk and booster. So I'm going to be upgrading in every way possible
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group