Cascade Crew Forum Index Cascade Crew
Message Forums
 
 GarageGarage   1/4 Mile Table1/4 Mile Table   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SLP cam

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
alloy
T56 Elitist


Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 1716
Location: Vancouver, WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:44 pm    Post subject: SLP cam Reply with quote

I've got a chance to pick up an SLP cam for $50. I have the L98 I got from Mike, but this one is $50 and I'm not much of a cam guy when it comes to computer controlled engine.

Specs are:
lift intake:.480
exhaust: .487

duration intake: 258
exhaust: 264

duration at .050
intake: 206
exhaust: 212

centerline: 212

Slp doesn't list this cam now, but they did back in 2002.

Here is what they say about it.

SLP hyd. roller camshafts are designed for 305 and 350 TPI engines in computer controlled street driven camaro's and firebirds. We have put a lot of dyno and road testing into these cams to ensure good driveability, acceptable idle and compatibility with all electronic engine controls, including the mass air flow sensor. Power gains as hgh as 30 extra horsepower on a 305, and 35 in a 350. Slp cams work equally well in both manual and auto cars.

I'm looking for a cam that will let me have torque down low, give me some top end, and not destroy my milage.

Anyone have any thoughts on what this cam will be like in a daily driver with vortec heads, 9.3 compression, scoggins/dickey intake, headers, manual trans, 3.42 gears?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rjmcgee
The Hammer


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2328



PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Should be a pretty good match for what your wanting out of her. Nice thing about the roller cams, if you don't like it switch it out with a differant one later.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That might be even a hair small. I am running a 206/216 on my 305. it has the same torque at 1800rpm as it does at 4000rpm. With your goals, I wouldn't go too radical, that really isn't much diffrent than that stock L98 cam, just a little more aggresive.

--John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
alloy
T56 Elitist


Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 1716
Location: Vancouver, WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't want to go aggressive, I like low end grunt, and good milage. And at 4:45 in the morning it's nice for it to start up and get me to work everyday.

Gotta build those airplanes you know Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What are the specs of the L98 to compare?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Schultzy89GTA
M.R.A. (11sec Club)


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 4417
Location: Gresham, OR

1989 Pontiac GTA

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

These are the specs as I understand them for the diff years. If this is to believed the SLP cam is actually a tad smaller than the 89 L98 cam that I sold you. I would be interested to see what part number is stamped on the cam Dan.


CAM 87 L98 14093643 Dur @.050 202/207 Lift (w/1.5) .404/.415 LSA 114.5
CAM 88-89 L98 10066049 Dur@.050 207/213 Lift (w/1.5) .415/.430 LSA 117
CAM 90-91 L98 10111773 Dur@.050" 202/207 Lift (w/1.5) .413/.428 LSA 114.5

-Schultzy

_________________
Red Sled: 89 GTA, 383, TKO, N2O

12.73 @ 109.39, 1.793 60 \ 11.794 @ 121.16, 1.62 60 (old combo)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
alloy
T56 Elitist


Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 1716
Location: Vancouver, WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

here's a pic the seller sent me.

I'll post more when I get home today. Can't stay online long at work.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
alloy
T56 Elitist


Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 1716
Location: Vancouver, WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, home now. Had a 747 flap track I had to finish up before leaving today.

I've been searching looking for info on the 51002 SLP cam and found some conflicting info. In their catalog the 51001 and 51002 have the exact same data. I think they had a typo and the 51002 specs are as follows.

51002 duration: 206/214 lift: .470/.490 seperation: 112deg

But............I also just found a post on TGO about the same cam and he has the cam spec card with the same specs I originally posted Duh Who's right? http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/tech-general-engine/24091-looking-info-slp-cam.html

I'm just not sure if it's worth going to this cam over the one I already have from Mike. It's cheap, but what are the correct specs and it is any real improvement over the stock L98 bumpstick?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would think ZZ4 cams would be easy to find, they are a small step up, and should fit the needs your looking for well.

--John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Schultzy89GTA
M.R.A. (11sec Club)


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 4417
Location: Gresham, OR

1989 Pontiac GTA

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dan,
I was talking about the numbers on the L98 cam. The specs on some of the L98 cams are actually 'bigger' than the SLP cam.

-Schultzy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Run the L98 cam. The LSA alone will be a great improvement in drivability and tunability. Not that tuning cams that small are tough... it's just that much easier.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
izcain
9sec Club


Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 1306
Location: Port Angeles WA

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

no wonder they produce a flat torque curve lol that lsa is a great match for street driven applications.
_________________

1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group