| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam

Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:32 am Post subject: another rearend question... |
|
|
we all know i need/want a new rearend so this is looking like a good idea, but i'm looking for some input here.
So I've been eyeballing the craigslist post of a 9bolt BW posi disc rear for a while.
http://seattle.craigslist.org/sno/pts/379997387.html
its a solid rearend, and its a 9 bolt which i really like, but the ratio is a 3.08 and it is missing the brake setup.
is $100 worth it for a start like this? how hard would it be to find a brake setup for this? or should i just wait till i find one complete?
sorry for all the questions
~JAKE _________________ 1983 Z-28 5.7 LT1, T56, Headman headers, BW 9 Bolt Posi Disc, WS6 suspension
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mangus Member

Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 254 Location: @computer in garage (Bothell)
1989 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
3.08 is for a manual. I wouldn't recommend it for an auto (I don't remember what you have). Also, consider the miles on an '85.
Fish is actually in the same boat - I think he's going to go with a rebuild, although I'll leave it up to him to comment.
9-bolts are good, but I'd find one (any rearend, really) with brakes. I've seen 9-bolts for $250 or less with full brake setups. Unless you plan on upgrading the discs anyway, in which case that rear might be OK.
If you want to drop the cash and plan on making a lot of horsepower, drop in an entirely new rear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
3.08 is the typical gear ratio for Manual transmission L03 cars. I think most of the LG4's with the stick got 3.23's. Don't know for sure though. One thing to consider though, is that parts are much harder to come by for the 9 bolt, if you break something, and therefore more expensive.
For the price its not bad, but I'd hold out for one that is complete if it were me. As Mangus eluded to, if you're not making tons and tons of power, a 10 bolt should be fine.
I always thought the lowest numerical ratio offered with the 9 bolt was 3.27?
my $0.02 _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam

Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks for the advice.
I found a disc brake setup on TGO for $100 so i was curious.
seems like paying over $200 for a rear that doesn't have the gears that i want or has high milage isn't the best choice.
please convince me if i'm wrong in this thinking
~JAKE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xophertony Rodeo Queen

Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5306 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
makes sense to me. why settle.
have you considered a 4th gen rear? they also have 28 spline axles. it will push your rear tires out a bit though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam

Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Xophertony wrote: | | have you considered a 4th gen rear? they also have 28 spline axles. it will push your rear tires out a bit though. |
4th gen rears are interchangeable??? hmm didn't know that. I wouldn't mind one at all!
wouldn't that just mean i'd need different wheel spacers?
~JAKE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| the 4th gen rears are your standard 7.625" 10 bolt. The are the same as ours, only 4" wider. I don't see a reason to go that route. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| At least with a 10 bolt you can put a good PBR disc setup and have a wide selection of gear ratio's. Unless you find a good 3.70 9 bolt with the PBR's like Mike did, I would stick with a 10 bolt. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redlava Member

Joined: 02 Feb 2007 Posts: 448 Location: Bremerton
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought the 3.08 ratio was a 10 bolt number? I believe stock 9 bolt numbers included 2.77, 3.27, 3.45, and 3.70
Last edited by redlava on Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:20 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mangus Member

Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 254 Location: @computer in garage (Bothell)
1989 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| redlava wrote: | | I thought the 3.08 ratio was a 10 bolt number? |
It is. My car is a 3.08 (M5) with a 10-bolt. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xophertony Rodeo Queen

Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5306 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i thought 4th gen cars had stronger rear ends then 3rd gen cars. you know, to hold up to LS1 power. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mangus Member

Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 254 Location: @computer in garage (Bothell)
1989 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Xophertony wrote: | | i thought 4th gen cars had stronger rear ends then 3rd gen cars. you know, to hold up to LS1 power. |
Heh. They might be a bit weaker than a 9-bolt, but it still takes a decent amount of power to break a 10-bolt (more than the 315-320 HP that stock cars make at most). Same rear end. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redlava Member

Joined: 02 Feb 2007 Posts: 448 Location: Bremerton
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| well that was quick. lol. Anyways I personally think the 4th gen rear looks dumb unless you have 4th gen wheels aswell 2 inches on each side looks like more then you would think. i agree that is probably stronger though than a 10 bolt from a thirdgen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| redlava wrote: | | i agree that is probably stronger though than a 10 bolt from a thirdgen. |
Based on what? It has the same ring/pinion, the same carrier, same design, same axle spline count, but the axles are longer also. I would say if anything, the longer axles would make it even weaker. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dewey316 wrote: | | redlava wrote: | | i agree that is probably stronger though than a 10 bolt from a thirdgen. |
Based on what? It has the same ring/pinion, the same carrier, same design, same axle spline count, but the axles are longer also. I would say if anything, the longer axles would make it even weaker. |
28 spline axles, 3rd gens only had those for 3 model years |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| so why would a 4thgens 28spline axle, be any stonger than a 3rdgens 28spline axle? That is what I am getting at. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not.
But it is also really hard to verify that a 3rd gen rear came from the right year to have 28 spline axles, or that it does in fact have 28 spline axles without disassembly. It is also pretty hard to find 3rd gen length 28 spline axles used. When I put this posi in my car I found out that it was a 28 spline carrier and couldn't find any used 28 spline axles at the time. Had to go with aftermarket. At least a 4th gen rear is guaranteed to have 28 spline axles.
The extra length aside, a used 3.42 10 bolt out of a 4th gen will get you 28 spline axles, if not better a newer posi, and a good disc brake set up.
Jake needs fancy wheels anyway, he just buys something that works with the width of the rear end and runs spacers on the front. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redlava Member

Joined: 02 Feb 2007 Posts: 448 Location: Bremerton
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I would say its stronger also because the 4th gens are 10 years newer aswell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mangus Member

Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 254 Location: @computer in garage (Bothell)
1989 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| redlava wrote: | | I would say its stronger also because the 4th gens are 10 years newer aswell. |
That doesn't make it stronger. Just less warn and perhaps longer lasting.
THe spline count would be the only differing factor in regards to strength, and it's a weak one to argue on. Pun intended. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mangus wrote: | | THe spline count would be the only differing factor in regards to strength, and it's a weak one to argue on. Pun intended. |
Wrong, the 26 spline axles are one of the first weak links. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|