| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Xophertony Rodeo Queen

Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5306 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:33 am Post subject: GTA got KYB GR2 shocks installed, spring queastions gallore! |
|
|
took the freeway to chris's house in portland and back. car handles noticably better at speed. now the only way to tell i am speeding is too look down at the speedometer. handling seems to be improved as well. car also can now go faster in and out of driveways and over speedbumps. chris said he thought the stance evened out a bit, and that the rear no longer appears to sag, i think i aggree. it may just be my immagination, but the whole car appears to sit about a quarter or half inch higher.
i forgot to grease the rear upper shock bushings, they are making a nice squeal on bumps. i will have to get back in there and correct that. i have also come to the conclusion that my springs are worn to the point of needing replacement. i am going to have to look into options on that.
regarding the springs:
i realy would like to maintain the cars current height. i believe it is probably sagging lower then stock height right now. if i find this to be correct i may get a set of 1" drop springs (which should keep the car in the same place). if i find that it is sagging less then 1 inch i will get a factory height replacement spring, probably from TRW/MOOG as i have had no complaints about the TRW replacements i put on the six (other then my remorse at cutting 1.25 coils off of the front).
a few questions:
does anyone on the boards have recently replaced factory springs? if so i need a measurement from the center of the hub to the fender lip (this way regardless of tire/wheel size the measurement is good)
does anyone on the boards have 1" lowering springs? i know most of you with aftermarket springs go with a 2" drop or more. if anyone has 1" of drop i would also be interested in a measurement from your fenderlip to center of your hub.
now that i think about it, i could use that measurement from anybody with a v8 who knows haw much lower their car is then factory.
i know depending on the weight of the car a 1" drop spring my lower a car by less or more then 1", but the difference between my fully loaded GTA and my basev 6 is only 330 pounds on the whole car, so i fuigure any v8 car should be close enough in weight.
and finally, when i lowered the front of the six by 1.25-1.5 " i was no longer able to run a 235s series tire, i had to jump down to 215s due top a rubbing issue. i was also jumping up to 15" wheels (from 14") at that time, i assumed it was due to that, but i am unsure. so this is for the 16" guys. if i lower my car, will that effect how wide i can go without rubbing? cause if it does that realy changes my plans. i like WIDE tires and plan on getting some real fat meat on my 16s (if i EVER get 16"s ) and if lowering my car will prevent me from doing that i won't lower. i can achieve better proformance gains from wider tires then i can with a slightly lower center of gravity.
thanks for all the help guys. i am off to the suspension board on TGO to do some research  _________________ 86' firebird (Junked in 2015). 88' GTA (sold in 2020).
| aaron_sK wrote: | | Hell, Tony drove his GTA to Cows a few years back with the pickup coil that came out in pieces. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm a little over 1", probably about 1.25 up front, and 1.5 in the back. I'll measure it when I get home from work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am 1-1.5" lower. Cut springs baby! Made me the perfect spring rate.
I put new springs on the back of mine, and it was still too bouncy, so I cut the originals I had! HEHE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ride height is over-rated. I like to roll on the bump-stops.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | and finally, when i lowered the front of the six by 1.25-1.5 " i was no longer able to run a 235s series tire, i had to jump down to 215s due top a rubbing issue. i was also jumping up to 15" wheels (from 14") at that time, i assumed it was due to that, but i am unsure. so this is for the 16" guys. if i lower my car, will that effect how wide i can go without rubbing? |
You've already got 16s you'll be fine. I don't know about the birds, but the Iroc's got a different steering box that doesn't turn the wheel as far. IT avoids the rub on the swaybar. You were able to tell by a big Z on the top of the box itself. I don't know about yours though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've got a book at work that lists most all vehicles stock ride heights. I'll check it out today.
You'll want to get springs on sooner rather than later to not wear out those shocks/struts faster. _________________
| Quote: | | Sometimes I actually think I'm slightly retarded in the mouth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I have the standard box on my car, I don't rub the sway bar, at full lock, with my wider wheels (255/45/17), I just barly will touch the plastic wheel tub. I haven't even had it touch the sway-bar, and my car is lowered abotu 3" in front. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| iansane wrote: | | You'll want to get springs on sooner rather than later to not wear out those shocks/struts faster. |
It shouldn't effect wear, in fact, new higher-rate springs, will wear them out faster. the major force that shocks/struts deal with, are the rebound forces, at high velocity. the higher the spring rate, the higher these forces **can** be. The age of the spring won't effect anything, Really, if you are happy with the stance, and they way the car drives and handle, just stick with what is there. Springs are pretty hard to hurt, unless you want to really change the stance, or change spring rates for performance reasons, there really is no need to change out the springs.
Remeber, at the first dyno gathering, where several people were so impressed with the handling of my car, I was rolling on 120k mile, stock SOFT RIDE springs.
--John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
And fat sway bars to compensate!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| it did work though. That combo actualy worked really well. I almost sometimes want to go back to that combo. If it wasn't for the fact that it needed the 4x4 stance to work, I couldn't get away with those spring rates, at the current ride height. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xophertony Rodeo Queen

Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5306 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Twilightoptics wrote: |
You've already got 16s you'll be fine. I don't know about the birds, but the Iroc's got a different steering box that doesn't turn the wheel as far. IT avoids the rub on the swaybar. You were able to tell by a big Z on the top of the box itself. I don't know about yours though. |
some transams got a tighter ratio steering box. and i have 15" pizza cutter wheels on the car now. they are actualy the wrong offset, so they rub bad in the front. they look realy sharp though, which is why i am sure whoever put them on decided to go that road. the offset brings them right to the edge of the fender lip. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Schultzy89GTA M.R.A. (11sec Club)

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 4417 Location: Gresham, OR
1989 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Your GTA should have the better power steering ratio unless that was also swapped out
Brandon just installed 1" lowering springs and is quite happy with them. I'm sure he'll chime in this afternoon.
-Schultzy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
14.5" from the center of the center cap to the very edge of the wheelwell lip on the IROC. Funny, it always seemed a bit lower in back. Must be me going crazy.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dewey316 wrote: | | iansane wrote: | | You'll want to get springs on sooner rather than later to not wear out those shocks/struts faster. |
It shouldn't effect wear, in fact, new higher-rate springs, will wear them out faster. the major force that shocks/struts deal with, are the rebound forces, at high velocity. the higher the spring rate, the higher these forces **can** be. The age of the spring won't effect anything, Really, if you are happy with the stance, and they way the car drives and handle, just stick with what is there. Springs are pretty hard to hurt, unless you want to really change the stance, or change spring rates for performance reasons, there really is no need to change out the springs.
Remeber, at the first dyno gathering, where several people were so impressed with the handling of my car, I was rolling on 120k mile, stock SOFT RIDE springs.
--John |
Good point. I was mainly thinking about most shocks/struts and their "sweet spots." Depending on how low it is, it may never get in that sweet spot.
I'm not sure of the internals of kybs but monroes almost all have a specifc range that is valved differently. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I took IROC springs, cut 1.5 coils out and put them in my V6 car. It sits about 25.5" to the fender lip. A-arms sit level. The ride is hard, but not too bad. My dad is impressed at least. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| blue89 wrote: | | I took IROC springs, cut 1.5 coils out and put them in my V6 car. It sits about 25.5" to the fender lip. A-arms sit level. The ride is hard, but not too bad. My dad is impressed at least. |
Hehe I cut 3/4 coil off my Iroc springs and it sits 1.5" lower in the front with the V8. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|