| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		DBL_TKE Member
  
  Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1505 Location: Aloha, OR
   1991  Chevrolet  Camaro Z/28
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:19 pm    Post subject: high RPM's | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Exactly how high can you safely rev a stock 136k miles LB9? I ask this because I've found that 3.73's seem to be a bit steep on some autocross courses and I've ended up having to rev out 2nd gear a little further than I'd like. To the tune of 6k RPM's a couple times. I know that's way past the optimal RPM band for power but on a 35-50 second course, shifting to 3rd gear momentarily and back down to second will kill your run times and really upsets the balance of the car under heavy braking. I'm pretty sure I don't have much to worry about the bottom end as that really isn't that high of an RPM, I guess I'm just worried about the valvetrain. I can already tell that my P.S. Pump doesn't like it much either, but at least I have a low miles spare. I really wish these cars had rev limiters. _________________ Richmond 3.73 posi| 36/24 sway bars | SLP LM2 | Koni's | Ground Control 800/200 | Y2K wheels | Dyno Don headers & Y-pipe | airfoil | BBK underdrive pulleys | Raised strut mounts | Extended ball joints | LCARB'S 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
  
  Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
   1987  Chevrolet  Camaro IROC-Z
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:47 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Oil pressure good, valve adjust good, no reason it can't touch 6k a few times. Wouldn't want to go over or hang out there for long. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		aaron_sK Member
 
  Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
   1987  Chevrolet  Camaro IROC-Z
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 4:55 pm    Post subject: Re: high RPM's | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | DBL_TKE wrote: | 	 		  | I really wish these cars had rev limiters. | 	  
 
 
Burn a chip and add one. All those GM chips have a rev limiter, the hotter cars just had theirs maxed out high. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Quasi-Traction "I have petals"
  
  Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
   1986  Chevrolet  Camaro Berlinetta
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 6:03 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| why not just put in a MSD 6AL box, Gives him the option to change the limit with a single fuse and gives him better spark delivery. Just my $.02. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Alphius Peanut
  
  Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
   1984  Chevrolet  Camaro Z/28
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 6:56 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Wouldn't burning chips move him up too many classes in Auto-X? It's been a while since I looked at the classing guide but ECU modifications generally put you pretty high up I thought.   _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
 
85 Silverado - Low and Slow | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		aaron_sK Member
 
  Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
   1987  Chevrolet  Camaro IROC-Z
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:32 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Alphius wrote: | 	 		  Wouldn't burning chips move him up too many classes in Auto-X? It's been a while since I looked at the classing guide but ECU modifications generally put you pretty high up I thought.   | 	  
 
 
SCCA Street touring category: 
 
 
 	  | Quote: | 	 		  Reprogrammed ECU (via hardware and/or software) may be used 
 
in the standard housing. Traction control parameters may not be 
 
altered. Altered  engine  controllers  may  not  alter  boost  levels  in 
 
forced induction engines. Alternate software maps which violate 
 
these restrictions may not be present during competition, regard-
 
less of activation. | 	 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Alphius Peanut
  
  Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
   1984  Chevrolet  Camaro Z/28
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:09 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Nice, I thought they didn't allow that in STX or STU. I was probably thinking of tunes on Subarus since they do disallow changing boost tables.   _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
 
85 Silverado - Low and Slow | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		DBL_TKE Member
  
  Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1505 Location: Aloha, OR
   1991  Chevrolet  Camaro Z/28
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:53 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I actually think they allowed tuning starting in the 2011 season for the street touring classes. I think I may do that. I'll have too see if I can borrow Dereks cable and burner, then I'd just need an adapter and chips. How does the stock rev limited work? Does is cut spark, fuel, timing? _________________ Richmond 3.73 posi| 36/24 sway bars | SLP LM2 | Koni's | Ground Control 800/200 | Y2K wheels | Dyno Don headers & Y-pipe | airfoil | BBK underdrive pulleys | Raised strut mounts | Extended ball joints | LCARB'S 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
  
  Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
   1987  Chevrolet  Camaro IROC-Z
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:11 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I was unaware of a thirdgen stock rev limiter. 
 
 
Speed limiter yes.... _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		aaron_sK Member
 
  Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
   1987  Chevrolet  Camaro IROC-Z
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:04 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Nothing to see here, Paul.   
 
 
Skyler, the stock limiter just cuts the injectors off hard till a given low RPM is reached. I ran one on my IROC and hit it many times. However, I never tried bouncing off of it for any length of time so I can't advise you on that. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
  
  Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
   1987  Chevrolet  Camaro IROC-Z
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:06 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Right on. The earlier software (pre Mangus) didn't have that cut into the definition files. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Alphius Peanut
  
  Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
   1984  Chevrolet  Camaro Z/28
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:28 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Most (never make a blanket statement!) factory EFI systems up until the last few years have done only fuel cut, as it's much nicer on cats and oxygen sensors than a spark cut or even a combination cut.   Unburned fuel is hard on those things, and even worse if it happens to ignite in the exhaust stream. Of course, fuel cut is much harder on the engine itself (super lean as it burns on the fuel pooled and atomized in the intake!), but the manufacturers have much less worry about that aspect of it.
 
 
I believe nowadays they simply all have drive-by-wire and limit RPM that way.
 
 
See my Youtube video in the Youtube thread for an example of why the factory prefers to not use spark cut...   _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
 
85 Silverado - Low and Slow | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |