View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:00 pm Post subject: The real trans swap... t56 inbound |
|
|
Hey all, so i've decided that my car is no longer any fun to drive. Being that it is slow, dirty all the time thanks to the terrible pollen of Austin, and an automatic.
So i've decided to take care of at least one of these things. I put it out to you, the crewbies and came back with a resounding Trans swap vote.
So the search begins...
Trans
I've found a vendor who sells fully rebuilt LS1 style t56's without core and upgraded shift forks for 1500. It seems high but then again i haven't seen one on craigs list for months.
Bell housing
He also sells the Gen 1 bell-housing for 250.
crossmember
I've seen t56 swap cross members from Spohn for 110, but it looks like there will be some modification needed to mount the torque arm.
flywheel & clutch
My motor is an older 2 piece rear main, am i going to need the super special crazy expensive flywheel if i go with an LS style trans?
"Petals" & hydraulics
Thirdgen pedals should work right, but do i need master and slave from 4th gen, or are third gen ok here?
drive shaft
this will need to be shortened? about how much do machine shops normally charge for this? and is the splines on my current driveshaft going to be compatible or will i need a new yoke as well.
I think that is all my questions for now. I'm eager to hear all your thoughts.
~JAKE _________________ 1983 Z-28 5.7 LT1, T56, Headman headers, BW 9 Bolt Posi Disc, WS6 suspension
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Leejo2005 Member
Joined: 12 Jul 2009 Posts: 466 Location: Kennewick
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Awesome I'm trying to do the same here. I thought the spohn crossmember for t56 was only for with an ls1 swap or does the transmission stay in the same place? I'd call to make sure because when I emailed them asking which one to use with 82-92 f body with gen 1 abc and ls1 t56 they replied, "none." but I'm sure one of the t56 elitists can step up and inform. _________________ 2010 Cobalt LT
1999 Taurus SHO
1974 F-250 460
1967 Satellite Sport 383 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Look at what I already posted.
You need the McLeod adapter plate AND Pilot bushing to run an LS T56.
SBC bell housing works. I spent the extra dough and got an SFI Lakewood scatter shield cause I like my feet.
Standard 2piece 10.5" flywheel
Standard thirdgen 26spline clutch/pressure plate.
Pedals thirdgen.
Master, slave, line thirdgen
Fork thirdgen
Driveline - maybe shortened. I don't know what setup you have now. If you have a 700r4 or Th350 with the small mainshaft, your yoke is fine 27spline. Shortening is usually between 100-200 to shorten and balance. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Xophertony Rodeo Queen
Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5304 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have an extra Gen1 bell housing I would part with for considerably less than $200. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alphius Peanut
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jake, would you mind letting me know what your source for the T56 is? That sounds like a decent deal to me. _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Price seems okay. Would be better if they have kevlar synchros, solid keys, and bronze shift pads. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alphius Peanut
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Slightly off-topic (but kinda not) question here.
What would I need to change in upgrading from scenario 1 to scenario 2?
Scenario 1. - GenI SBC with McLeod adapter, LS1 T56 and stock-style clutch/hydraulics/etc., shortened driveshaft.
upgrade to
Scenario 2. - GenIII/IV LSx with the same T56 as before.
What would be changed, and what would have to be purchased in order to make the same T56 work for the swap? I assume it would be bellhousing, LSx clutch, stock length driveshaft and 4th gen hydraulic system. Is there any more?
Reason I ask is I may go for the T56 before the LSx in order to lessen the sticker shock of doing the entire swap all at once. But that route may not be worth it if I need to spend a bunch of money to convert the setup over when I go LSx anyway.
And Jake wants to know as well for his eventual LSx swap. _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds about right. I never got a chance, but I really wanted to check out fitting a SBC Gen I scatter shield to an LS.
LS uses the top bolt, and not one of the upper 45deg angled bolts. So it should work... I just don't know about depth.
But yeah, you'd need the LS flywheel for sure. Not sure if the clutches are interchangable as far as using a fork style clutch from a SBC onto the LS flywheel.
The LS uses a hydraulic throw out bearing. No fork, no provision for a fork in the LS bellhousing. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for inquiring for me gabe. That's all very good info.
Paul, the 10.5 in flywheel I need is basically a stock flywheel for our cars? If so i can get one of those easy.
Where is the shifter location on a t56? Am I going to need to do anything more than just cut a hole in the floor?
Thanks again for the answers to my stupid repetitive questions.
~ jake _________________ 1983 Z-28 5.7 LT1, T56, Headman headers, BW 9 Bolt Posi Disc, WS6 suspension
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just had a thought on the driveshaft.
I thought one of the popular mods was to install an LS1 alumn driveshaft in our cars and no modifications needed. Why would he need shorten the DS if its considered a normal bolt in mod? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rjmcgee The Hammer
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2320
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Because in our cars the T56 sits farther back than in a 4th gen. 3rd gen and 4th gen uses the same length shaft. Thus requiring shortenning. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I had to space out the shifter stick and I moved it forward an inch. Not sure if it was just my chassis or what. Never heard anyone else doing that.
Yes a standard 153tooth flywheel for a 2 piece rear main SBC. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iansane Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5740 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
rjmcgee wrote: | Because in our cars the T56 sits farther back than in a 4th gen. 3rd gen and 4th gen uses the same length shaft. Thus requiring shortenning. |
Technically, it only requires shortening if you go the LSx t56 route because it's even further back. Even someone would naive enough to try the LTx t56 you'd still have to move the shifter location back, but the output shaft location is still in factory-ish location and you can use a stock length shaft. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Leejo2005 Member
Joined: 12 Jul 2009 Posts: 466 Location: Kennewick
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
83Z28BlackBetty wrote: | Thanks for inquiring for me gabe. That's all very good info.
Paul, the 10.5 in flywheel I need is basically a stock flywheel for our cars? If so i can get one of those easy.
Where is the shifter location on a t56? Am I going to need to do anything more than just cut a hole in the floor?
Thanks again for the answers to my stupid repetitive questions.
~ jake |
I bought the floorpan section cut out of a scrapped f body for like 30 bucks on eBay and welded it in. The factory opening in the floor is nicely reinforced and has the holes for the shift boot. I kept the hole on the floorpan where the autos shift capable passes through to run wires for my electric speedo and reverse lights. _________________ 2010 Cobalt LT
1999 Taurus SHO
1974 F-250 460
1967 Satellite Sport 383 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I cut my hole where the shifter outlet was. Then like I said I spaced the shifter to the drivers side an inch and forward an inch to get it perfectly centered in the shifter hole of the STOCK console.
Keep in mind too, the McLeod adapter plate is 1/2" thick, which also pushes the trans back. Which is why you need the special pilot also. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam
Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BluFbdy Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 915 Location: Port Orchard WA
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thats the one i bought for my swap _________________ If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You're swapping LT1, he's doing LS1. Different ballgame.
As Paul already mentioned the LS1 unit sits farther back than the LT1. That could push the rear mount back past the slot in that crossmember. Could always just cut and reweld it a little farther back if it's an issue though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BluFbdy Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 915 Location: Port Orchard WA
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
good point, but wouldnt hawks offer a different crossmember for lt/ls if that were the case? this has me wondering if ive got the right one lol _________________ If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Call and ask em. I thought the LS swaps kinda put everything proportionate to where the GEN 1 stuff sits... _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|