View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
alloy T56 Elitist
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1716 Location: Vancouver, WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 9:51 pm Post subject: Rear brake delema |
|
|
As you know I've got the 9" and just picked up an extra set of LS1's rears today to put on it. I also have the superlite II's I got off the fireturd.
In looking at the superlite pads it looks like they will have almost twice the contact area on the rotor and way more piston area. These are large 4 piston calipers and looks like a much smaller caliper is usually used on the back. But.........I am way under braked on the back now and was looking to raise the rear pressure to compensate for this. I'm planning on putting an adj. prop valve on the back line also.
I've worked out mounting the LS1's on the 9"already and could make a bolt on bracket to mount the superlites and be the needed spacer for the backing plates. The way I have it worked I could actually mount the stock calipers and the siperlites both on the rear. It's just that easy really. Guess if the suplerlites didn't work I could easily bolt the stockers on.
So..........go with the bigger calipers or stay with the stock LS1's. Am wanting opinions and feedback on this. I'm still in the decision making process right now. Can't do much right now anyway.......am still kinda sore. _________________ Member of the "Elite T56 Club" , big brake club, and "burgundy" (not red or maroon) car owner.
www.t5cablespeedometer.com
www.t56cablespeedometer.com
Ronald Reagan: "Most of us wonder if our lives made any difference. Marines don't have that problem." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
how much play do you get in the axle flanges with the 9" ?? The thing I would be worried about would be pad-knock back on the superlights, if you have any side/side axle movement.
On the 9" it should be MUCH better than say a stock c-clip style rear, but would be something I would think about.
I would thinking that you don't get much gain from that huge caliper. Since you end up limiting the hydrolic pressure to the bakes anyway, it is not like you are gaining any clamping form, or needing to worry about fade resistance.
But, hey, you already have them, always worth a shot. Paul is using the old C4 setup for his rear brakes now, you can ask him how using a caliper designed for the front is working for him. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alloy T56 Elitist
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1716 Location: Vancouver, WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is NO side axle movement in the axles. The bearings are pressed onto the axle and are held into the housing with a 1/4" steel flange with about .020 preload clamping on the bearing holding it in the housing. Only way there would be any movement in the axle would be in the case of a bearing failure.
I'd planned on gutting the stock prop valve and adding the adj. prop valve to the rears with the stock setup to try and get more pressure to the rears, just concerned that these calipers may be overkill and no way to dial them down to get the balance I want. So much more pad and piston area with the superlites than the stockers. I'm not sure if there is a way to calculate this or not.
You mentioned I wont get any more clamping from the superlites. With the increased caliper piston area what is your opinion based on concerning this? _________________ Member of the "Elite T56 Club" , big brake club, and "burgundy" (not red or maroon) car owner.
www.t5cablespeedometer.com
www.t56cablespeedometer.com
Ronald Reagan: "Most of us wonder if our lives made any difference. Marines don't have that problem." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iansane Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5740 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alloy wrote: | You mentioned I wont get any more clamping from the superlites. With the increased caliper piston area what is your opinion based on concerning this? |
I'd presume the fact that you're going to have to dial down the pressure so much in the rear to not get lock up before the fronts. The area will be there but the force behind that area will be less.
You always have the option of tuning the bias with pad choice as well. Run a much more aggressive pad in the front vs rear. _________________
Quote: | Sometimes I actually think I'm slightly retarded in the mouth. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alloy wrote: | Only way there would be any movement in the axle would be in the case of a bearing failure. |
Bearing failure in the 9-inch tends to be vertical anyhow, not horizontal. Ask me how I know this. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alloy T56 Elitist
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1716 Location: Vancouver, WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iansane wrote: |
I'd presume the fact that you're going to have to dial down the pressure so much in the rear to not get lock up before the fronts. The area will be there but the force behind that area will be less.
You always have the option of tuning the bias with pad choice as well. Run a much more aggressive pad in the front vs rear. |
Well I don't want to run a more aggressive pad in the front, I'm already using "K" compound pads and they are pretty touchy and lock waaaay before the rears. In fact I can't lock the rears at all that's why I was going to gut the stock prop valve and use the adj. valve If I run the stock LS calipers in the rear I'm not sure if I can ever get balanced braking. But are the superlites so much that I can't dial them down?
Another trick we used to balance braking force and stay legal in SCCA was to mill slots in the pads to remove pad surface area. This it an easy option for me also.
But as I said I can unbolt the superlites and bolt on the stockers if it doesn't work. That's the beauty of the bracket I've designed. I was expecting this to be really hard to adapt the LS brakes to this rear, but it's as simple as a 1/4" spacer plate and a spacer ring to use to hold the axles in. Everyone I talked to told me to go with the big bearing ends and explorer brakes. Just having the ends installed was $600. And the exploder brakes are no where near the setup the LS's are. _________________ Member of the "Elite T56 Club" , big brake club, and "burgundy" (not red or maroon) car owner.
www.t5cablespeedometer.com
www.t56cablespeedometer.com
Ronald Reagan: "Most of us wonder if our lives made any difference. Marines don't have that problem." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iansane wrote: | alloy wrote: | You mentioned I wont get any more clamping from the superlites. With the increased caliper piston area what is your opinion based on concerning this? |
I'd presume the fact that you're going to have to dial down the pressure so much in the rear to not get lock up before the fronts. The area will be there but the force behind that area will be less. |
Ian pretty much nailed it. You are limited by the line pressure. since you want the fronts to lock up just before the rear's, you are limited to a clamping force that much smaller in the back. No matter how big a caliper you put back there, you end up just turning down the pressure and not using the extra piston area or pad size.
If you have them, try it and see what you get, if it works, great, if not you don't lose anything. But, i don't think you would be disappointed with the LS1 rears, and some good pads in the back. There is so much less energy being turned into heat in the back, that fade shouldn't be an issue with the back brakes even at the stock LS size.
--John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alloy T56 Elitist
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1716 Location: Vancouver, WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I understand what Ian is saying, but I'm dissapointed in the LS1's now with very good pads, and fade isn't a problem at all with my setup. Not being able to balance the rears to the fronts is what I'd like to cure. But after saying that I've not upped the rear pressure yet by modding the prop valve.
In talking with JERRYWHO on TGO he calculated he needed an additional 500 psi of rear pressure to make the rear LS's almost equal to the 13" fronts. We have the identical setups for brakes. 500 psi is a lot to try and gain.
I don't want to dial the fronts down, I'd like to raise the rear force to make them more equal to the fronts. Same problem I was working on before, but now I have another option to try. _________________ Member of the "Elite T56 Club" , big brake club, and "burgundy" (not red or maroon) car owner.
www.t5cablespeedometer.com
www.t56cablespeedometer.com
Ronald Reagan: "Most of us wonder if our lives made any difference. Marines don't have that problem." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would do away with the prop valve completely. Just run the lines straight out of the master, and put your valve on the rear brakes. Then you have full pressure to both front and rear, and can dial in your rear to whatever you need.
Not that I am saying the superlights will be bad (I would never want anyone ot think that bigger isn't better!), I am just having hard time seeing how you can be that short of rear braking with the LS1 setup.
--John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alphius Peanut
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dewey316 wrote: | Not that I am saying the superlights will be bad (I would never want anyone ot think that bigger isn't better!), I am just having hard time seeing how you can be that short of rear braking with the LS1 setup.
--John |
Cause he's still using the stock prop valve which isn't putting enough pressure to the rears to make them work effectively in relation to the fronts.
I echo everything that has been said so far regarding rear brakes. If nothing else, bigger looks better and will be more impressive, even if it's the same level of effectiveness as the LS1 rears. _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alloy T56 Elitist
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1716 Location: Vancouver, WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alphius wrote: |
Cause he's still using the stock prop valve which isn't putting enough pressure to the rears to make them work effectively in relation to the fronts.
|
I thought I said that. _________________ Member of the "Elite T56 Club" , big brake club, and "burgundy" (not red or maroon) car owner.
www.t5cablespeedometer.com
www.t56cablespeedometer.com
Ronald Reagan: "Most of us wonder if our lives made any difference. Marines don't have that problem." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alphius Peanut
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alloy wrote: | Alphius wrote: |
Cause he's still using the stock prop valve which isn't putting enough pressure to the rears to make them work effectively in relation to the fronts.
|
I thought I said that. |
You did, I just reworded it.
Like everyone else says, LS1s would be fine with the proper brake proportioning, but I think if you have the Superlites why not throw them on? _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alloy T56 Elitist
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1716 Location: Vancouver, WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alphius wrote: |
Like everyone else says, LS1s would be fine with the proper brake proportioning, but I think if you have the Superlites why not throw them on? |
I'm working on the CAD drawing for the mount now. _________________ Member of the "Elite T56 Club" , big brake club, and "burgundy" (not red or maroon) car owner.
www.t5cablespeedometer.com
www.t56cablespeedometer.com
Ronald Reagan: "Most of us wonder if our lives made any difference. Marines don't have that problem." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alloy T56 Elitist
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1716 Location: Vancouver, WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Got my bracket designed and found a guy on CL that will plasma cut them out for $25. That's a steal. I have to supply material, but I was expecting at least $75 minimum for this. If you need parts cut like this I'll post a link to him.
He has 4ft x 8ft capacity.
Now need to start looking for someone to sand blast the rear to get rid if that hideous, god awful, fugly, ugly RED that someone painted the rear with. How could anyone in their right mind ever paint car parts red like that
_________________ Member of the "Elite T56 Club" , big brake club, and "burgundy" (not red or maroon) car owner.
www.t5cablespeedometer.com
www.t56cablespeedometer.com
Ronald Reagan: "Most of us wonder if our lives made any difference. Marines don't have that problem." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alloy T56 Elitist
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1716 Location: Vancouver, WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well some more progress. Picked up a 3.70 center section for $50. Need to swap my 31 spline posi in it now. Also got the backing plate holes filled and re drilled and mounted to the housing.
"Finally" found the correct axle seals. Took 2 days and looking through many different seal catalogs to find them. They were in stock at schuck's but not listed as a seal for any ford rear that I could find. Was a mopar seal they said Also got some new axle bearings. Picked up a conversion u-joint and need to see if it fits now.
Now waiting for my caliper brackets. Hopefully next week some time. And need to get the welding done. I may have a guy locally that can do it.
So...some progress, it's slow but progress none the less. _________________ Member of the "Elite T56 Club" , big brake club, and "burgundy" (not red or maroon) car owner.
www.t5cablespeedometer.com
www.t56cablespeedometer.com
Ronald Reagan: "Most of us wonder if our lives made any difference. Marines don't have that problem." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iansane Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5740 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good to hear progress! It'll be cool seeing a 9 with LS1s on it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alloy T56 Elitist
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1716 Location: Vancouver, WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I'm planning on putting the superlites on it, but using the stock LS1 drum parking brake setup. All it would take to put the LS1 calipers on is to just bolt them on after I get the spacer plate/caliper brackets (doubles as both). Heck the way I'm setting it up I could put both sets of calipers on. If the superlites don't work out I can just use the LS1's. Just unbolt the superlites and bolt on the LS1's.
I'm just so surprised that everyone I've talked to even Currie says this can't be done with the small bearing 31 spine axles. Another guy married explorer drum brake setup to the LS1 disks, and then did extensive welding/fabricating on the brackets to get the calipers on. This was just so simple, and having a second set of LS1 brakes made it much easier instead of tearing my car apart to do this. _________________ Member of the "Elite T56 Club" , big brake club, and "burgundy" (not red or maroon) car owner.
www.t5cablespeedometer.com
www.t56cablespeedometer.com
Ronald Reagan: "Most of us wonder if our lives made any difference. Marines don't have that problem." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alloy T56 Elitist
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1716 Location: Vancouver, WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Got my caliper brackets yesterday. The guy did a great job for $25 including material. I designed them and emailed him the file. Easy as can be. He is a little ways out......Beavercreek but it's an easy drive.
Started drilling my axles for the new studs, but one of them is hard...............very damned hard. Glad I know how to sharpen drill bits.
If anyone needs front caliper brackets this guy is a good cheap alternative. Great work and fast turn around time. The bracket designs are online for most front brake conversions.
_________________ Member of the "Elite T56 Club" , big brake club, and "burgundy" (not red or maroon) car owner.
www.t5cablespeedometer.com
www.t56cablespeedometer.com
Ronald Reagan: "Most of us wonder if our lives made any difference. Marines don't have that problem." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iansane Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5740 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mind passing on his info? I'm hankering for some new brakes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alloy T56 Elitist
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1716 Location: Vancouver, WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|