View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
batcave Member
Joined: 31 Mar 2008 Posts: 74 Location: VANCOUVER,WA
1989 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:23 am Post subject: deq |
|
|
i tried to get my car threw deq today it failed once again i heard of a new tax for v8 cars in washington state 2011 every time you liscense car its an additional 600 every time you liscense or renew your v8 car in 2011 i heard this from deq has anyone heard of this if this is true we all need to fight this law |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:39 am Post subject: Re: deq |
|
|
batcave wrote: | i tried to get my car threw deq today it failed once again i heard of a new tax for v8 cars in washington state 2011 every time you liscense car its an additional 600 every time you liscense or renew your v8 car in 2011 i heard this from deq has anyone heard of this if this is true we all need to fight this law |
Not true. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
flea Member
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 1246 Location: Raymond WA
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think you're talking about Washington senate bill 6900. But that dates back to 2008, and in that bill a 5.0 to 5.9 liter engine would run $325
6.0 to 7.9 would run $400
And 8.0 and up would run $600.
I don't know what ever happened to that bill but it didn't cost me nearly that much last time I put tabs on my car. _________________ Killing mailboxes since 2009 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
'92 camaro boss Member
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 410
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Man i hope that isn't true, and if it is that it's not as much..
maybe i should of put that mustang motor in the chevelle |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
flea wrote: | I think you're talking about Washington senate bill 6900. But that dates back to 2008, and in that bill a 5.0 to 5.9 liter engine would run $325
6.0 to 7.9 would run $400
And 8.0 and up would run $600.
I don't know what ever happened to that bill but it didn't cost me nearly that much last time I put tabs on my car. |
Many senators have been written and replied that that bill never went anywhere. It wasn't even a Bill... _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
flea Member
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 1246 Location: Raymond WA
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I knew it didn't go anywhere, I can't believe it ever would go anywhere. _________________ Killing mailboxes since 2009 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|