| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:05 am Post subject: q on tuning |
|
|
So now that I have my side to side problem fixed, on to tuning this thing.
I am seeing that one area of my ve table is reading 103%. Does that imply I dont have enough injector? If the motor was "boosting itself" that would be reading on my kpa right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Could be with your coolant modifiers, your ve table would be off. They are just numbers in alot of GM cases. Even though it says 103% doesn't mean it's seeing 103% Real life volumetric. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
coolant modifiers?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you see how the equation is the main table VE divided by the change coolant temp modifier.
Post a screen shot of that table. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That is part of it, there is another table for charge air temps. The computer is adjusting how the fueling reacts and VE changes based on intake air temps.
You should also have other stuff that modifies fueling based on other factors such as coolant temp.
Also remeber that the VE is not duty cycle. Does your logging software log duty cycle, and actual calculated VE? There are lots of modifers that act on the main VE table.
I guess I am maybe jumping in late on this, what computer is this for? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I dont know what all this program will do. Its to do alot of crap I cant make it do even following the downloadable manual. Would think after 2.5 years I would know more, but I dont. No shop here will touch my car, and nobody in the area runs this program on a gas motor.
It will log injector duty cycle. Think I should turn it on and see?
LS1b pcm, with 2002 express van tune.
I can buy a custom crank wheel, coil packs and run coil per cyl  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
logging duty cycle will answer you really fast, if you are running out of injector.
The VE will be effected based on what parameters you put in for the injectors, coolant scalars, etc. Anything in the computer that effects fuel calculations will add/remove fuel ontop of whatever is the in the main VE table.
Also, i noticed that the max value for the VE table is 5~something. The number in that VE table may or may not be a VE percentage, it may be some other unit of measurement. You might want to find out how that computer actualy uses that table. It could be something base in g/sec or something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alphius Peanut

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AFAIK:
VE (volumetric efficiency) is a ratio of the volume of air&fuel actually entering the cylinder to the theoretical maximum volume that would enter the cylinder given a standard atmospheric pressure. Therefore, VE=(actual efficiency/perfect efficiency). The way the ECU uses this information is backwards, actually. It measures the volume of air entering the engine (or measures the load of the engine which can be extrapolated to air), and it knows how much fuel the injector will spray for a given amount of open time. It also knows how much fuel to spray to make a stoichiometric ratio at 100% volumetric efficiency. These things are known because of the injector constant, and MAF scaling table. (Unless it's MAP, but that's simple too because manifold pressure can be used in nearly the same way as mass-airflow data as far as the ECU is concerned.)So, the ECU needs a way to account for less-than-perfect conditions. It doesn't know what the VE at each RPM/MAP point is unless you tell it with the VE table (and there are other fuel-trimming tables, but we care about VE right now).
Here's a sample fueling equation that incorporates VE:
| Code: | | Inj. PW = REQ_FUEL * VE * MAP * E |
REQ_FUEL is a number that represents how long to open the injector for a 100% VE and Max Load situation.
VE is the value from the VE table.
MAP is the current Manifold Pressure (Or current airflow reading)
E is enrichments such as warmup, accel enrich, injector latency, O2 feedback, target AFR etc.
Let's give it a try:
| Code: | | 2.835ms = 15ms REQ* 45% VE * 42kPa * 100% E |
That is a representation of my car idling. If I do the math, my injector pulsewidth needs to be around 2.835ms of open time per injection event. If you play with the numbers a little bit, you can easily see how if the REQ_FUEL variable is off a little bit it can drastically affect the VE table. The VE table therefore does not really represent anything useful as far as hard, real-life numbers go. It is simply integrated into the fueling to cause the injectors to squirt the correct amount of fuel. having a 103% VE value does not mean the engine is boosting, it simply means that given whatever equation your engine uses for fueling, it needs to inject that ratio of fuel to achieve your target AFR.
Last examples, I promise.
| Code: | | 15.45ms = 15ms REQ* 103% VE * 100kPa * 100% E |
| Code: | | 15.45ms = 16.26ms REQ* 95% VE * 100kPa * 100% E |
According to your table, that's a full throttle run at around 3600RPM. See what I mean? VE is useless for you knowing anything about your engine. Those two pieces of code there show you that depending on other variables within your ECU, 103% VE and 95% VE can mean exactly the same injector opening time, and the exact same amount of fuel delivered. I just assumed the REQ_FUEL values, REQ_FUEL is actually derived from how many injection events there are per cycle, injector size and engine displacement. All of which are user-definable values and all of which affect the VE table.
Thanks for reading my novel, if you made it this far. Here are a couple links to find out a bit more on what VE actually is. It always helps to understand something before you try too hard to tune it.
The first part of this one is pretty good:
http://www.installuniversity.com/install_university/installu_articles/volumetric_efficiency/ve_computation_9.012000.htm
Even though this is a MegaSquirt document, it still applies for learning the basics of how ECUs determine fueling.
http://www.megamanual.com/v22manual/mfuel.htm#equation
READ THIS:
If your engine is running at the right AFR according to a wideband AF meter at all RPM/load points of operation, then the VE table is tuned correctly no matter what the values in it actually are. Your VE table has little except the name in common with actual VE of your engine.
Cheerio! At least if you didn't want all this information it's here for you or anyone else if they need it.
 _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alphius Peanut

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dewey316 wrote: | | logging duty cycle will answer you really fast, if you are running out of injector. |
Also this, if that's all you really wanted to know. Sometimes I get carried away. _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alphius.. I had to go get some food so I could focus on all that, whew.
About it just knowning air, and calculating the injector length, I knew that.
I tried to read for a good 3mo or so before I got into this. But my largest problem in life is comprehending what I read (oh and spelling too!!). I do way better seeing it done, and someone "dumbing it down" for me.
I'm mostly worried that if something is at 103%, is something not large enough to handle everything else? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alphius Peanut

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 91RSVert wrote: | | Alphius.. I had to go get some food so I could focus on all that, whew. |
I had to go get some food so I could write all that. Wasn't sure how much you already knew, so I tried to cover all the bases.
| 91RSVert wrote: | | I'm mostly worried that if something is at 103%, is something not large enough to handle everything else? |
Not at all.
The VE table is just one of the multipliers for your required fuel number. The actual percentages in it have no basis in real life. It's just a guess for the ECU as to how much fuel to inject. O2 feedback tells the ECU whether it guessed correctly or not. The 103% does not map to any "real life" anything, and the ECU cannot modify the VE table by itself. It will never change unless you change it. Smaller numbers make it leaner at that point, larger numbers make it richer.
Here's all you need to worry about as far as "not enough".
A restriction in the intake tract will make your MAP still show a little vacuum under WOT. That's not enough air.
Log injector duty cycle. If it's above 85% or so on WOT your injectors are too small. That's not enough fuel.
Still running the stock Express Van tune on there? Or is it already a little modified? _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, its modded. Ive been hacking at it for 2.5 years...
1. The ve table for it was much much flatter.
2. My car needed alot more idle air then the van to even start.
3. Changed the speedo output.
4. Had to swap vats from one style to other (yes, it still works)
5. Been playing with egr
6. Had maf running for a while, kept getting errors. Went to install a 85mm maf, but couldnt decide on a route, then it got stolen and havent gotten a new one. So maf is disabled.
7. Tune is for an automatic, I am stick right now. I think that is some of the issues I am having.
My onboard vac meter reads about 1.5'ish on a wot run. I am assuming the modded gm dual snorkle is doing decent for the setup?
BTW, I have been doing this w/o a wideband also.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alphius Peanut

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 91RSVert wrote: | Oh, its modded. Ive been hacking at it for 2.5 years...
1. The ve table for it was much much flatter.
2. My car needed alot more idle air then the van to even start.
3. Changed the speedo output.
4. Had to swap vats from one style to other (yes, it still works)
5. Been playing with egr
6. Had maf running for a while, kept getting errors. Went to install a 85mm maf, but couldnt decide on a route, then it got stolen and havent gotten a new one. So maf is disabled.
7. Tune is for an automatic, I am stick right now. I think that is some of the issues I am having.
My onboard vac meter reads about 1.5'ish on a wot run. I am assuming the modded gm dual snorkle is doing decent for the setup?
BTW, I have been doing this w/o a wideband also.  |
Cool. Want to email me your tune? I'd like to see it. I have the EFILive Demo version so I think I can open it but not modify anything.
gabe (at) thecornman (dot) com
What sort of issues are you having that you want to tune out? Driveability? The auto tune could cause a couple problems maybe with some driving situations as a stick.
Vacuum meter is at 1.5ish units of what on WOT? I run a GM TPI snorkel on my Holley Stealth Ram 350 and have no problem. I have yet to cut the bases out of the filter housing too, but I did remove the screwed-on diffuser thingies.
Wideband would be nice... You can still tune fuel without one to a safe level though. _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yea, I'll send you my latest, and find the stock one too. But it will be later tonight.
Two biggest issues..
1. When I start the car, let it warm up it idles just fine as thats what I set my grams ps(here on gps) too. But I turn the car off, come back, it requires a complete different gps... like its stuck on fast idle. I have it set now so when it first warms up, its adding gps at full temp and sometimes feels like its going to stall. Then on restart its still fast idle, but not so bad it screams.
2. Since I have maf delete, I know it plays tricks with timing tables. I cant figure out which timing table I need to play with. Id like to remove some timing in my idle/low rpm areas for lope and fuel savings. Then of course add some at my drive and wot areas.
Another, but I know how to adjust, just havent. Since I'm a stick, I push in the clutch while coasting to a light, it will still stay reved as the pcm is still reading mph. I need to make it remove gps faster at the upper speeds, and less at lower speeds.
In my readings they said you can tune w/o a wideband, but its harder and takes more runs. Thats fine as they said dont make the full adjustment, take it in small incriments as it may be reading some residule(sp?) effects from some other area. _________________ 2008 GMC Z71
1991 Camaro RS Vert
1972 Jimmy 4x4
20ft Longhorn Car Hauler
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|