| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam

Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:40 am Post subject: Exhaust stuff |
|
|
So this project is WAY out (summer), but it never hurts to start planning and dreaming. I am running the stock clogafolds, cat and muffler and need to let this baby breath!
What are the differences between long tubes and shorties? Besides the length
Advantages to running a single big pipe or duals like Paul?
this is currently my daily, so i can't run straight headers, but i need to wake this thing up.
I come humbly to the masters. teach me.
~JAKE _________________ 1983 Z-28 5.7 LT1, T56, Headman headers, BW 9 Bolt Posi Disc, WS6 suspension
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
To put it easily. tube lenght/diam acts the same on exaust as it does on intake, the length of the primary tubes will have a max effeciancy at a specific RPM, the longer the tubes the lower the RPM. Most long tubes are very good for mid-range power, while shorties are better for high RPM.
Now, on our cars packaging becomes and issue, so most people go the shortie route. The dual vs single, is again, how much fabrication and work are you willing to put in. The single exaust can support a descent about of HP, and you can buy a premade cat back. To get a setup like Pauls, you will have to pay someone to do it, or weld it yourself like he did.
--John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stock crap-ifolds are designed do be cheap and connect the exhaust to the heads.
Shorties generally are made to take the place of the stock manifolds yet allow the exhaust to exit the heads unrestricted (reduce backpressure if you will)
Long tubes are DESIGNED to give you exhaust scavaging with little regards to your feelings. They are often times hard to install but the performance is the best. Many use true dual and require custom work to get them in.
Regardless of manifold type, the choice of single or dual is often debated. My opinion is that few people actually have cars that could benefit from duals. Unless your running serious power, a single 3" with mandrel bends is ample. Not to mention the extra weight you gain with going to duals.
I am running shorties on single 3" mandrel with dual 2.5" out flowmaster. Just because it was on the car when I installed the motor. I'm pretty happy with it mainly because it sounds good. I'm pretty happy with the car in general though. _________________ E30
86 RS - 7.4L V8 SOLD
89 RS - 3.25L V6 REMOVED
89 RS - 5.7L LT1 SOLD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Picking your exhaust is like picking a camshaft.
You have to match it to the engine or look at it being too big for now and ideal later, or ideal now and too small later.
With my engine I ran the same ET at the track with a single 3" cutout exhaust, as I did when I built my dual 3" back with mufflers. But that's my engine.
For your mild manored 250ish horse 350... a single 3" will do fine. If you go single 3" you should go shorties. It's easier to install and if you run long tubes into a Y pipe... well it's kind of like being the smartest kid with down syndrome. IMHO of course. If you run long tubes, they are cool and do help with scavaging. Ground clearance is compromised then you have to get into some fab work to get the duals to clear on the drivers side (as our cars were never meant for true old fashioned duel exhaust.)
If you go that route, use an X pipe.
I have shorties, I love them. No hassle with install... and believe me they've been on/off a dozen times. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
STEEL Member
Joined: 22 May 2007 Posts: 417
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| STEEL wrote: | | On TGO they have come to the consensus that this is the best shorty and y-pipe setup |
But they also said that relocation brackets "fixed" our suspension. Take TGO Tech for what it is, a bunch of internet jockey's reposting 10 year old info they searched for on TGO.
--John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
STEEL Member
Joined: 22 May 2007 Posts: 417
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya i suppose that is true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam

Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
how much fab work does it take to run long tubes? I mean look who you are talking to, i'm not afraid of a little project.
I want to over build now so i don't have to redo it later if i throw in a 400SBC or whatever.
~JAKE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Depending on brand long tubes, some have ground clearance issues if you lower the car.
For someone who currently drags the stock y-pipe, I could never go to long tubes.
*does dance as headers are getting installed on 22nd* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiveoformula Member

Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1799 Location: OR
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
i would just get a nice shorty/y-pipe set then finish it of with a high flow cat(or no cat) and a manduaral bent cat back, to keep it simple with stock locations because there really isnt to much-if any difference in performance _________________
'88 FORMULA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it all depends on the motor. For example, Mikes motor needed the dual 3", the single 3" was choking his motor, but his is sort of the extreme. On the other hand, on a stock motor, you would probably lose power over most of the powerband, and may pick up something at the very top end.
Jake -- Do you have a full plan worked out, and what your goals for the car are, etc. It may make sense to spend the money now on something like Mike and Paul have, but if your goals are just a good cruiser with descent power, than you probably don't need it.
--John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
[whispers]Kurfbird is selling a shorty with mandrel no cat setup for 150[/whisper]
I agree with dew (again). It doesn't make sense to spend $1000 on an exhaust you may never utilize. Especially when something that works for your current setup is so cheap. _________________ E30
86 RS - 7.4L V8 SOLD
89 RS - 3.25L V6 REMOVED
89 RS - 5.7L LT1 SOLD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 91RSVert wrote: | Depending on brand long tubes, some have ground clearance issues if you lower the car.
For someone who currently drags the stock y-pipe, I could never go to long tubes.
*does dance as headers are getting installed on 22nd* |
I think I've scrapped my LTs a couple times, but only on the potholes I don't seen on the freeway or coming into a raised parking lot. And I'm lowered 2.5" in the front. But I've got hedmens that are notorious for tucking up farther. They've just got every other clearance issue.
I'd just go with shorties for now. Easy to install, can make a custom Y that'll tuck and flow well. And wouldn't they be cheaper coated?
Wait, F the shorties. Get turbo headers.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|