| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:01 am Post subject: Supercharger |
|
|
I have been doing dome reading on Superchargers.
I would like to know what everyone thinks about these, what one is best.
This would not include the Detroit diesel type super chargers.
We are going with the Paxton, Vortech, procharger, type.
This will be going on a very built sbc short block, not the current engine in the our car.
What are the pluses and minuses, repair, rebuilding, longevity, boost capability, stuff like that, maybe ease of use.
Been looking at Prochargers
What do you think?
Thanks
Scott |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just make sure build the car to handle boost.
IE Lower compression.
And be prepared for more tuning than you've ever been prepared to do before!
The only plus is more power!
The downsides are yeah you'll wear the motor out faster, It's not forgiving if you find yourself lean, and it's kinda in the way.
I've never done a boosted motor just read and watch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:30 am Post subject: tunning |
|
|
Ya I figured that,
We are going with the commander 950 with this next engine, so It should be a tad better.
But we are trying to get a good supercharger, one that has a good reputation; I have been reading about the vortech's, they seem to need rebuilds often.
On the other hand the prochargers look to have a pretty good following of people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raiden Member
Joined: 10 Mar 2004 Posts: 193 Location: tacoma
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The best s/c for our cars is the ATI D1SC! I have a paxon sn 2000 and it works great, but it taks a crap load of power to turn in contrast the vortech's and ATI. ATI is by far the proven supercharger on TGO for our cars...wish I had one:( |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Demon 12sec Club

Joined: 09 Jan 2004 Posts: 1189 Location: You're not worthy
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
the procharger's are excellent... your best bet right off the bat is the D-1SC ...
you'll have some parasitic loss since they're belt driven, but they're a centrifugal design not a roots design so they're more efficient, but you're going to have gobs and gobs of power throughout... so honestly you won't notice the parasitic loss at all... you'll also want an intercooler (preferably not air to air)... keep those temperatures down as best as you can.
you'll want some damn good spark, some very large injectors, and a fuel pump that won't up and die after a few hard runs
Procharger also makes an F-Body kit as far as I know... they're the best out of the three you listed, Vortech and Paxton have their limits and as you mentioned they need to be rebuilt often.... Paxton is more or less the same, though you don't find many people running them compared to the prochargers or even the vortechs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Raiden wrote: | | The best s/c for our cars is the ATI D1SC! I have a paxon sn 2000 and it works great, but it taks a crap load of power to turn in contrast the vortech's and ATI. ATI is by far the proven supercharger on TGO for our cars...wish I had one:( |
Hey Craig, I thought you did have an ATI?!?!  _________________ '86 Trans Am - 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6
'85 Camaro Berlinetta - IROC clone
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raiden Member
Joined: 10 Mar 2004 Posts: 193 Location: tacoma
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sup John! I've not been around much in the past few years. Been going thorugh the career change, school, then change agian till I finally have my dream job = BIZ E! Things are finally starting to slow down..kind of.
Anywho, no, I WISH I had an ati procharger! my paxton is a great superchager..cheap and easy to rebuild! And I can run mid to hi 12's all day......but i still wish i had a procharger:( |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:02 am Post subject: procharger |
|
|
I see alot of the P1SC
what are they? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ATI |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Demon 12sec Club

Joined: 09 Jan 2004 Posts: 1189 Location: You're not worthy
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:11 am Post subject: Re: procharger |
|
|
| scott in wa. wrote: | I see alot of the P1SC
what are they? | some people will see the benefit of the D-1SC, others won't... they're virtually identical in every way... the only differences are the maximum flow (P-1SC is 1200cfm, D-1SC is 1400cfm), and max boost (P-1SC is 30psi, D-1SC is 32psi)... that's it really.
they D-1SC is just for that extra "oomph" basically....
so the P-1SC sort of maxes out at around 825hp, and the D-1SC maxes out at about 925hp.
on the kits offered from procharger, the P-1sc is about 9-12 psi, with an intercooler thats a pretty damn high gain in power, they claim 60-80% ... not entirely sure how accurate that is though
the D-1SC kit is 15-20psi and only says 65% plus, but since its a more capable supercharger, one assumes you can get more out of it than they claim
but whatever you do... run it with an intercooler, the people who don't regret it in the end. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| are the compressor housing diffrent, or is it just a diffrence in the compressor wheel? Depending on the drive ratio's, and compressor designs, the smaller one may be more effecient at lower boost levels. It might be worth a call to ATI, and finding out if you can get a compressor map, and drive ratio's and such, to figure out which one will get you the highest effeciency at the boost level, and rpm range you are going to be running at. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raiden Member
Joined: 10 Mar 2004 Posts: 193 Location: tacoma
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have done a lot of research on this topic as I was going to sell my paxton and upgrade to an ATI. I chose to keep my paxton because a new supercharger was going to set me back 4g's, so I did some other things to my car to achieve the power I was after.....much less than 4G's. The P1sc does not flow as much CFM as the D1sc. The D1SC produces power faster and at lower rpms due to the increased air flow. If you go with the p1sc, you will have to increase your boost level to get more power, and then you will be contending with more heat due to the increased boost. do your self a favor, get teh D1sc if your going to spend the cash on a supercharger...it will save you money in the end! I wish I would have purchased the ATI when I got my paxton...that decsion alone would have saved me a lot of money!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Demon 12sec Club

Joined: 09 Jan 2004 Posts: 1189 Location: You're not worthy
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dewey316 wrote: | | are the compressor housing diffrent, or is it just a diffrence in the compressor wheel? Depending on the drive ratio's, and compressor designs, the smaller one may be more effecient at lower boost levels. It might be worth a call to ATI, and finding out if you can get a compressor map, and drive ratio's and such, to figure out which one will get you the highest effeciency at the boost level, and rpm range you are going to be running at. |
http://www.procharger.com/models.shtml  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Demon 12sec Club

Joined: 09 Jan 2004 Posts: 1189 Location: You're not worthy
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Raiden wrote: | | I have done a lot of research on this topic as I was going to sell my paxton and upgrade to an ATI. I chose to keep my paxton because a new supercharger was going to set me back 4g's, so I did some other things to my car to achieve the power I was after.....much less than 4G's. The P1sc does not flow as much CFM as the D1sc. The D1SC produces power faster and at lower rpms due to the increased air flow. If you go with the p1sc, you will have to increase your boost level to get more power, and then you will be contending with more heat due to the increased boost. do your self a favor, get teh D1sc if your going to spend the cash on a supercharger...it will save you money in the end! I wish I would have purchased the ATI when I got my paxton...that decsion alone would have saved me a lot of money!!! |
the price differences are really not big between the P-1SC-1 and the D-1SC either... the D-1SC allows for a much higher PSI when bought in a "kit" form... 9-12 psi for the P-1SC-1 and 12-20 for the D-1SC
if you've got the cash to spend on it, a few hundred bucks won't make a difference if you're getting the better one out of the two choices |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no, that is not nearly the detail you would need. You need to see a compressor map, that shows the effeciency for a given RPM and thus CFM flow vs pressure ratio, then map out the engine use on that, and find which one hits the best effeciancy.
It would probably take a call to ATI, and specificly ask for the compressor maps for the two models. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Demon 12sec Club

Joined: 09 Jan 2004 Posts: 1189 Location: You're not worthy
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hrm, they used to have them online on that page... let me see if I can't track them down ... I know they're available online though |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Craig, I seem to remember you running some decent numbers (mid 12s?) at the SIR gathering several years ago. Your car was definitely the pride of the crew at that event!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|