| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:22 am Post subject: struts |
|
|
Humm.
The e-bay thing is for two struts and two shocks.
The summit thing looks like its each.
Also whats the difference with the two struts you listed in summit, wondering why one is way cheaper.'
OK , looks like they are struts and shocks, total at summit $139.66, plus shipping
Ebay, 127.99 with shipping, just about the same 12 bucks
thanks
scott |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Summit sells front and back sets sepperatly, thus the two different links.
I didn't notice that the eBay seller had the struts too. My bad.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:02 am Post subject: summit sold in sets?? |
|
|
So are you saying that the price listed in those links are for two???
It says "Quantity: Sold individually "
if its sets, not individually that would make a huge differance
Check it out see the add in summit.
what do you think?
scott
Last edited by scott in wa. on Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:07 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
The add in summit, looks like it is for just 1.
And I am not a big fan of KYB. Shocks/Struts, are a KEY peice to performance of the suspension, and really here more so than other places, you get what you pay for. For handling performance, Koni is a league of their own, followed by Tokico and Bilstein, KYB is a very distant 4th place. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Damn.... $600 for Koni's all around w/shipping.
Edit: You're right Scott. Summit's are not a set. I didn't see that line at first. 
Last edited by aaron_sK on Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:16 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I would post shock dyno graph results, on all the shocks available for our cars, but just as it was on TGO, I am sure the information would be lost on most people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm... search of TGO turned up nothing. Put it up, I want to see this.
BTW, Dewey, what difference will a lower or stiffer spring make on your shocks as far as performance goes? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok,
Here is a graph showing compression and rebound valving on a Koni.
Here is Bilstein
Here is the ADJUSTABLE KYB, this is a MUCH better shock that their non-adjustables, Notice how this shock adjusts the compresion valving also, this is not good. the adjustment you want is on the rebound side, such as the koni has.
Now, the scary part this ils the rear adjustable rear, which should read...non-adjustable, lol.
Compare that to the Koni rear adjustment range.
The real key to controling springs (especialy important with higher-rate lowering springs)
Now, just to put things in persepective. Here is an OEM rear shock.
The KYB actualy has less rebound that the stocker, at high valve speeds.
Hope that helps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xophertony Rodeo Queen

Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5306 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
wow. suck. i bought KYBs cause the guy at napa said they were the next best thing to bilstiens (which he could not order)
meh... they are still better then MY stockers (which were doing nothing). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Xophertony wrote: | wow. suck. i bought KYBs cause the guy at napa said they were the next best thing to bilstiens (which he could not order)
meh... they are still better then MY stockers (which were doing nothing). |
@ trusting a parts store guy...
err...
Dewey, where would be a good place to find more info about how bound/rebound valving affect teh suspension? I've never really understood whether you should go with a real stiff bound/rebound or not as well as why. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Had a "shock"ing experience as a kid with my velle. Schwaabs sold me a set of 70/30 shocks. Put them on, oh my. Every time I hit a bump I was bottoming out. Looked like Squeeks. It was worse then the $5 shocks I bought at a tent sale. The shocks would collapse easy then not let the car back up. Took them back, argued a bit, then they got me some 50/50s. Was at least driveable.
Anyway, I'm following this thread as well. I've got crap sensa-trac's on the bird. I've gotta say that lowering the car helped them though. The way they're designed they have a groove that is wide where the shock normally rides and narrow towards the ends. So the shock get's stiffer the further out of it's rest position it moves. So with it dropped a couple inches i'm in the "stiff", unworn section. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ian, best is probably just start searching the web, for information on shock valving and vehicle dynamics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you aren't going to be a suspension GURU, and don't want to fork over $100's for Shocks/struts.
KYB are hands down the way to go. Better than OE and sensatrac stuff. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks man.
Do books like 'Tune to Win' and such have large bits about shocks/valving/etc? I haven't had a chance to do any bookwork on that kind of stuff but I'd like to.
Although I'd probably do better to just go to a track...
As far as shocks go, I've got the Bilstein HDs on my bird and I like it better than stock but that isn't saying much. I think when I replaced them, they were the originals. I'm almost to the point where I'd like to pick up a second set of another style to compare. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|