| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Danked Banned
Joined: 10 May 2006 Posts: 278 Location: Toppenish, Wa
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:12 am Post subject: 305 And 350 Question. |
|
|
Are the engine mounts for a 305 and 350 the same? I know my year camaro came optional with a 305, so if they are not interchangable then i might not be swapping in the 350. Thanks. _________________ Towed amaro, 2nd engine blown spent $1500 not spending more. Decided not worth it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xophertony Rodeo Queen

Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5306 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
short answer:
YES
long fun answer:
the 350 CID was available in the 3rd gen from 1987 to 1992, so a 350 was also available in your year.
HUGE post about this on TGOs engine swap board. the only mod you have to do to mount the block in your fbody is move a break line. (you can literally bend it into it's new location, or get some line from Napa and make your own). now to actualy get it running you will have to do alot of other stuff, but to mount it that is all you need.
but it breaks down like this. you know how a 2.8 3.1 and 3.4 are all the same block on the outside, and the only difference is the bore and stroke? Small Block Chevys (SBC) are just like that. a 305 is an SBC and uses the same mounts as any other SBC. anything from a 262 to a 400 block will drop in.
there have been 10 different GM production displacements (262, 265, 267, 289, 302, 305, 307, 327, 350, 400), with differnt bores and strokes, and different internal casting. all are basically the same on the outside, which means that a post 86 350 will drop right in to a 1955 originaly equiped with a 265. provided the post 86 accessories will fit in the engine bay of course, but the block will.
for more information on the longest running engine design, you can visit these websites: http://www.aa1car.com/library/2005/us70512.htm
http://www.circletrack.com/thehistoryof/58038/index.html
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/thehistoryof/0605ch_small_block_chevy_history/
or visit your local library  _________________ 86' firebird (Junked in 2015). 88' GTA (sold in 2020).
| aaron_sK wrote: | | Hell, Tony drove his GTA to Cows a few years back with the pickup coil that came out in pieces. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wait... I'm confused a bit here....
| Quote: | | I know my year camaro came optional with a 305, so if they are not interchangable then i might not be swapping in the 350. |
The Camaro came optional with four engines that year. But how would that affect your swap options? Basically the frame was designed to accept either a 90* sbc, or a 60* V6, depending on mounts and transmission. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
here's what will NEED to be changed on your car for a 350:
1) Motor mounts.......you can use the lower half of the "clamshell", but the part that attches to jounce bumper to the upper that bolts into the block will need to be changed. I think the upper portion is fairly universal on Small block Chevys.
2) Radiator: If your upper hose connection is on the drivers side and lower connection on the pass, you can use it. Otherwise, find a V8 radiator. If you want to keep your air conditioning, you'll probalby want a 3 core (V8) radiator anyways. ) I'm assuming your 350 will be a V belt. You probably won't be keeping the Air contitioning since it will be grooved for a serp belt.
3) ECM: This can either be thrown away (since I'm assuming your going non-emission and carburated) Be careful when pulling apart stuff.....get a wiring diagram and only pull what's attached to the ECM harness. I've only done it on factory carbed cars (carbed 2.8L and carbed 305) so I dunno how integrated the emission/induction controls are with the wires to other important things (like igntion coil, temp sensor, oil presure sensor..etc)
4) Your fuel lines will be on the drivers side. If you keep a mechanical fuel on that 350, you'll have to route them to the other side of the car somehow.
5) Brake lines: your motor mounts will change postion from the rear-most holes on the crossmember to the front most. Unfortunately your brake line runs right where your motor mount needs to go, so you'll have to either re-bend it, or replace it.
6) The fuel pressure will need to be lowered since your going to a carbed V8 from a Fuel injected V6. You can eliminate the in-tank pump. That's probably your best route if you stick with a mechanical fuel pump on motor. if you don't feel like dropping the tank and taking the in-tank pump out, you'll have to get a fuel pressure regulator.
7) unless you're converting to manual steering, be sure to get the pressure and return lines off a V8 power steering pump. You might do well just to get a a whole pump with all the bracketry to mount it, since the V6 will mount differently than a v8 pump will.
8) Your stock suspension will work, but don't hit bumps hard.....you'll be kissing pavement and bottoming out regularly.
I'm sure there's something else I haven't thought of that someone else will chime in with. _________________

Last edited by Quasi-Traction on Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
82camaro383 12sec Club

Joined: 11 Sep 2005 Posts: 117 Location: Pullman/Vancouver, WA
1985 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I had problems with the suspension when i dropped my 90* v6 w/ a th350 into my 82. I couldn't have any people sit in the back because the driveline hit my safety loop everytime i hit a bump. I noticed that v6 motor mounts are taller and more narrow than v8 mounts. I'm not sure if that makes any difference. _________________ 85 Z28, 383 Stroker, TH350 tranny, Richmond 4.10 gears, dual exhaust
Fastest Time: 12.7sec @ 107mph |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Aren't V6 springs shorter in front to compensate for the lighter engine? I remember reading a post on TGO about someone trying to save cash by using them to lower a car. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Danked Banned
Joined: 10 May 2006 Posts: 278 Location: Toppenish, Wa
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah ive heard the v6 springs are shorter also, so im going to have to check that out. i dont want a th350 tranny i need to get a v8 700r4 i like the OD is this going to be an easy swap, or after i pull my engine am i going to regret doing it and im going to run into a bunch of pot holes and be stuck and shizzle? also, my year came with 4 engine options? funny cause at autozone they ask "do you have a 305 or a 189 v6" they dont ask 350 or 2.8 or whatever.. _________________ Towed amaro, 2nd engine blown spent $1500 not spending more. Decided not worth it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nathan J Member
Joined: 24 Dec 2005 Posts: 161 Location: spokane
1986 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
v6 springs with a v8 didnt really seem to change the ride height at all on my car, it sucks it looks like a 4x4 lol ill take some pics and show you, it has 14in rims on it now, tires are a little taller then the 15s t/a wheels and tires that were on it but only like a 1/4 in.
Nathan _________________ 86 firebird
383sbc
th350 t brake
4th gen rear soon 9in ford rear |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
*checks TGO*
Yay.... I was right! TPI 350, TPI 305, TBI 305, and MPFI V6.
Dunno.... but since your asking autozone people....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Xophertony wrote: | short answer:
YES
long fun answer:
the 350 CID was available in the 3rd gen from 1987 to 1992, so a 350 was also available in your year.
HUGE post about this on TGOs engine swap board. the only mod you have to do to mount the block in your fbody is move a break line. (you can literally bend it into it's new location, or get some line from Napa and make your own). now to actualy get it running you will have to do alot of other stuff, but to mount it that is all you need.
but it breaks down like this. you know how a 2.8 3.1 and 3.4 are all the same block on the outside, and the only difference is the bore and stroke? Small Block Chevys (SBC) are just like that. a 305 is an SBC and uses the same mounts as any other SBC. anything from a 262 to a 400 block will drop in.
there have been 10 different GM production displacements (262, 265, 267, 289, 302, 305, 307, 327, 350, 400), with differnt bores and strokes, and different internal casting. all are basically the same on the outside, which means that a post 86 350 will drop right in to a 1955 originaly equiped with a 265. provided the post 86 accessories will fit in the engine bay of course, but the block will.
for more information on the longest running engine design, you can visit these websites: http://www.aa1car.com/library/2005/us70512.htm
http://www.circletrack.com/thehistoryof/58038/index.html
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/thehistoryof/0605ch_small_block_chevy_history/
or visit your local library  |
Hehehe... now for the exceptions. This post isnt to confuse Danked. For his purposes everything you said is fine.
First all v/8s 57 and earlier didnt have the motor mount pads on the sides of the block. Motors were mounted on a pair of stands that connected the lower holes on the front of the block, then there were 2 mounts that bolted to the bellhousing. This means that all 265(correct me if i'm wrong but i think 283s supplanted 265s in 57) chevy's and the first year 283s won't bolt into newer chassis's. I had a 57 283, one year only block. There isnt even mounting bosses to drill on these motors.
Also some later motors didnt have the holes in the front, so they won't bolt into the early chassis without modifications. My 68 327 was one of these. I actually had to drill the hole for the fuel pump pushrod holding bolt.
Then the last exception is the 307. I'm not entirely sure what is different but at least in chevelles they had their own motor mounts. Most people don't realize they're different until their 350 doesnt bolt in. I see alot of posts on team chevelle about this.
Anyway, Danked 305 or 350, it doesnt make any difference to you either will bolt in the same. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't forget that 265's don't have an oil filter pad machined nto the block........(I think this changed in 1956..but I'm not sure)
Also 283's (maybe some 327's?) that went in 62-67 Chevy II's (nova's) had a special block with a recessed oil filter pad so it would clear the K member. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xophertony Rodeo Queen

Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5306 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
all the crap i read never mentioned that....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Danked Banned
Joined: 10 May 2006 Posts: 278 Location: Toppenish, Wa
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
haha tony autozone ppl. im just saying what they said. my dad wasnt sure if the 305 engine mounting bolts were in the same position as the 350. so i guess the only problem right now is buying this truck, and pulling the engine. but i just wanted to make sure before i put myself in this position. thanks guy, i appreciate it, i couldnt think of anyone else to ask who would know any better. _________________ Towed amaro, 2nd engine blown spent $1500 not spending more. Decided not worth it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xophertony Rodeo Queen

Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5306 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Danked wrote: | | haha tony autozone ppl. |
what?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Danked Banned
Joined: 10 May 2006 Posts: 278 Location: Toppenish, Wa
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Asdfga3 wrote: | *checks TGO*
Yay.... I was right! TPI 350, TPI 305, TBI 305, and MPFI V6.
Dunno.... but since your asking autozone people....  |
^^^ _________________ Towed amaro, 2nd engine blown spent $1500 not spending more. Decided not worth it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xophertony Rodeo Queen

Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5306 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Danked wrote: | | Asdfga3 wrote: | *checks TGO*
Yay.... I was right! TPI 350, TPI 305, TBI 305, and MPFI V6.
Dunno.... but since your asking autozone people....  |
^^^ |
what does that have to do with me? asdfga3 said that.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Danked Banned
Joined: 10 May 2006 Posts: 278 Location: Toppenish, Wa
|
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
haha oops i thought u did _________________ Towed amaro, 2nd engine blown spent $1500 not spending more. Decided not worth it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xophertony Rodeo Queen

Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5306 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
ok.... that was weirding me out.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Danked Banned
Joined: 10 May 2006 Posts: 278 Location: Toppenish, Wa
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
ok tony i have a confession..... im obsessed with you. THERE i said it. happy?  _________________ Towed amaro, 2nd engine blown spent $1500 not spending more. Decided not worth it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think we all knew that already.....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|