| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:59 pm Post subject: What is going to cause a steep dropoff in mileage? |
|
|
I've noticed that it seemed like the car was going through a hell of a lot of gas lately, so over the last week I tallied up my fuel spent and mileage. Came up with this:
15.2 gals (10.3 Plus, 4.9 Premium)
196.5 miles, mostly around town, 35~50mph 2K~3.5Krpm
For those of you without calculators, that comes out to just under 13mpg. And if you think that's bad, it gets worse: I have 3.73 gears out back, and so my odometer is off by about %10. Which puts actual mileage more in the range of 10-11mpg. I had never checked the mileage before, but I am sure it wasn't that bad.
Specs:
1987 IROC
5.7L TPI V8 (L98)
Rebuilt TH-700R4 w/2000 RPM stall and fluid cooler
4th-gen aluminum driveshaft
3.73 Borg Warner
K&N's w/Airfoil
Headers w/custom exhaust
A/C & AIR delete
Low-temp thermostat (usually around 180* less on the freeway, more around town never below 170* or above 200*)
Hypertech Chip (yeah, yeah)
I know it has a AFPR on it, but without a gauge, I can't test that. It's not throwing any codes at all, and it's running as good as it ever has. I decided to swap out all the plugs while I'm replacing the header gaskets anyway. Next day off I get I'm going through and checking all the wires and the cap/rotor.
There is another thing that's bugging me though: Lately whenever I fill up, the gas tank seems to have a lot of pressure in it when I take off the cap. It didn't do this when I first bought the car, which is making me think possibly that something is wrong with the charcoal evap canister. I know that those do tend to boost mileage a tiny bit (due to a little excess gas getting dumped in) but I can't imagine that much of a difference due to just that problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice to meet you today man! How much did you end up paying for that gasket? Should've waited for me to ring you up.
On topic; I know on my old 87 when the 02 started going out I ended up getting like 120 miles to a tank (on a 12 gallon fillup, never really put more than that in). Once I swapped that out mileage shot back up to 190-220 a tank.
They aren't too much, about 18 bucks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gasket was $10.99. Ended up paying $30 for that and a set of Bosch Platinums. Is it possible for an O2 to go out without throwing a code? When the one on my Ford blew out it sent all kinds of codes at me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My 87 never threw a code. It was just giving shitty info.
I've heard NGK plugs working well in our cars from a few guys that stop in. No idea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kurfbird Member
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 866 Location: Whidbey Island
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:11 pm Post subject: o2 sensor |
|
|
Yea it possible.
Most of the time you wont get a code. They recomeded that you replace it like every 30,000 miles.
Me EGR went out on my 92 350 and never got a code just got a surge while crusing.
A buddy of mine told me that by the time you get a code the car willl just about not run. _________________ kurfbird
1991 Camaro 3.1 v6
1991 Firebird 3.1 v6
1992 Formula 350 5.7
700r4 Transmissions
brucesthirdgenparts.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If it's as cheap as you say, I'll just pick one up. When I replaced the one on my Ford, it cost me over $50, plus another $15 for the damn tool to get it off, since Ford decided to put it in a place physically impossible to reach with a wrench.
Is the O2 bung in the header itself, or is it farther down in the pipe? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice iroc by the way.
It'll be driver side manifold, just above where it bolts to the y-pipe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cool. If it's as cheap as you say, and you guys have it in stock, I'll swing by after work tomorrow and pick one up. I might as well kill all three birds at once when I pull off the headers.
BTW, thanks. My car needs a wash job bad though. I just cleaned it last week, but with this weather it's starting to look like an Arizona car.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you putting shorties on? _________________
| Quote: | | Sometimes I actually think I'm slightly retarded in the mouth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| No, pulling them back off to replace the gaskets, then I decided while I had them off I would replace my plugs (Edelbrock's, so that's the only way to get at the plugs), and now I figured I might as well do this too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xophertony Rodeo Queen

Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5306 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
you actualy hafta yank the headers to replace the plugs? and i thought my SLPs were bad. i have to use a cut socket w/box wrench on 4 of them, box wrench on two and on the last two i can use a real spark plug socket and wratchet driver. i also run acell shorty plugs now.. which i can say made no change to the ease of plug changing. keeps the wires about a half inch farther from the headers though... think i'll run the delcos again next time.
ian i think i am going to replace my o2 sensor next time i am under the car. sounds like a plan. _________________ 86' firebird (Junked in 2015). 88' GTA (sold in 2020).
| aaron_sK wrote: | | Hell, Tony drove his GTA to Cows a few years back with the pickup coil that came out in pieces. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Xophertony wrote: | | ian i think i am going to replace my o2 sensor next time i am under the car. sounds like a plan. |
You using the r44lts plugs?
Should be able to get the 02 from up top... Might be different with headers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xophertony Rodeo Queen

Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5306 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| iansane wrote: |
You using the r44lts plugs? |
i don't know what that means... i still have the box if you want a part number or somthing.. but they knew what i was talking about at the counter.
| iansane wrote: | Should be able to get the 02 from up top... Might be different with headers. | with the SLPs it is WAY easy to get from the bottom. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Xophertony wrote: | you actualy hafta yank the headers to replace the plugs? and i thought my SLPs were bad. |
I can get a few plugs, but there are some that you cannot even get a socket over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, after swapping out the pligs (needed them bad) and the O2 sensor, the Camaro is running better than ever, but still drinking more gas than a three-ton Ford.
I belive it has an AFPR (small screw on top of the regulator between the rails, right?). Assuming it does, I was looking around TGO and eBay, and I'm thinking about picking up something like this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/AUTOMETER-CARBON-FIBER-FUEL-PRESSURE-GAUGE-4712_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ6763QQitemZ8061047423QQrdZ1.
(Ian, I think that's something along the lines of what you're running on your HSR.)
Is it a good idea (or even possible) to just run the gauge of the valve on the rail, or am I going to need a hose and bracket to mount it?
Edit: Apparently that BBcode trick doesn't work here. Don't mind me.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can't really run that style right off the fuel rail. I didn't think about that when I bought mine thougt; I was going to mount it inside but decided against having a fuel line into the cockpit.
Check this one out.
http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=SUM%2D800260&N=0&autoview=sku
$16.00 and you can mount that directly to the rail.
If you don't want to wait for shipping I picked up something similar at Grainger (sp?) in fife when I had TPI. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice. I used to work just down the road from that place.
Is it generally a good idea to leave it on the rail permanently? Seems like it would be an easy way to snap off a Schradder (sp) valve. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| On my old TPI unit I think I actually pulled the schrader valve out so it was an open threaded hole and just threaded the old liquid filled guage I had straight into the the fuel rail. I'm pretty sure that's how my buddy is still doing it. (He put the TPI unit on a 350 and dropped it in an 86 cherokee) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, on that intake, there are two vacuum connections dirrectly above the schrader valve (one is actually the AFPR line), so I'm going to have to go with a 90* connection no matter what gauge I use.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That guage is pretty small, 1.5" tall overall, I think it's got it's fitting in the back for just such an application. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|