View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:08 am Post subject: Sons 1st car, and our project |
|
|
Hello everyone.
My son wanted a z28 and we found a 87 near Portland, so we towed it home and are in the process of putting a .060 over 350 in it.
We still have the 305
It’s an auto
I was wondering when we get around to getting a chip burned, is there some one here that can do it?
This has been a good experience for my son, he is 17 and I had talked with him about your club. He was very interested. So we should be attending some of your get together.
Is there a member ship fee? Or something? How does that work?
I posted this on third generation under tpi and found out about this group
http://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/showthread.php?s=5c782de98c06d33afec8478fea4f2b4e&threadid=313732
Many thanks
Scott, and Chris |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iansane Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5740 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey, It's nice too see more enthusiastic thirdgenners around here. There are a few more in the Tacoma area, quite a few north and south of here as well.
I don't know much about custom tuning. I just started messing with my bird as well. Do you have anything to burn your own chips? We should have a small mini-gathering with some other local tacoma guys.
No membership fee (that I know of!). Moreso just a bunch of guys that like to talk about crap and our cars.
Most of the Portland area guys are more active on this board though. _________________
Quote: | Sometimes I actually think I'm slightly retarded in the mouth. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:32 pm Post subject: cars |
|
|
No I don't have anything to burn chips.
But I may have to buy the stuff to do it.
My son is really into his car, even though it is just sitting in the drive.
He is always messing with something
No motor in it...hehehe
Soon there will be.
Thanks
Scott |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:01 pm Post subject: Re: Sons 1st car, and our project |
|
|
scott in wa. wrote: | Is there a member ship fee? Or something? How does that work? |
Unofficialy, you are supposed to buy me a beer. (I'm only kidding)
There are several of us here who do plenty of tuning, I know that Mangus (he actualy writes the software that people use to tune) is in the Seattle area, there are a couple of us here in the Portland area that do tune our cars, and also a couple in BC. I would imagine if you get a chance to get together with Ian, he can easily get you started with the tuning, and then as questions arise, feel free to ask away in here! (some of us are real geeks, and really love to talk about the tuning of stuff.)
Coming to a get together is a great thing to do, you can get a chance to see hands on, how the tuning works, and the software involved. You will also get the chance to meet some great folks, and probably have a great time. I don't really know that anything is planned for this fall yet
(you WA guys need to get something together!!! I'm in need of a little road trip.)
--John _________________
"Ever see a Motorcycle in front of a Psychiatrists Office?" Me neither |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iansane Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5740 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:35 pm Post subject: Re: Sons 1st car, and our project |
|
|
Dewey316 wrote: | (you WA guys need to get something together!!! I'm in need of a little road trip.)
--John |
Hey, I've said multiple times I'd be more than happy to host something at my house! I've got PLENTY of room, floor space as well as parking. (and some beer). Big screen TV for movies and crap (134"). I've got a sporatic schedule so I'd need to request off early. But anytime is good for me!
Oh and scott, I can show you how I've started tuning but it may be different how you go about it. There are quite a few ways to do it. Just burning a chip, emulation, prominator type thing. I've got the Prominator that replace your stock chip and you just hook your car to a laptop and upload a new program whenever you want. As for the actual prgramming. I'm lost. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:48 pm Post subject: chips |
|
|
wow that sounds interesting
pros and cons on this?
how about cost wise?
thanks
scott |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iansane Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5740 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not too familiar on price of chip burning and such. I'm sure john (dewey) can help with that.
I payed $175 for my prominator. I borrow a laptop and aside from the $30 "donation" for the Tunerpro software that was it, I think. Oh yeah and an ALDL cable (which I bought ) but you can make for REAL cheap.
Have you checked out the DIY-PROM board at thirdgen.org? You can learn SO much there. I've learned a lot but I'm more of a learn-as-I-do/learn-as-I-watch kind of guy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iansane wrote: | I'm not too familiar on price of chip burning and such. I'm sure john (dewey) can help with that. |
I payed more than that for my stuff, but that was before all these other options where out. I beleive that the burner is now about $85, and then about $40 for the adaptor.
www.moates.net has all the products you would need. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5474
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Glad to see you made it over here Scott. I see some of the tuner guys are allready helping you out. That's an area I know little about. Old fashioned carb guy here. Not sure when our next gathering will be but that's definately a great time to have these guys help you. Much easier hands on. I read that DIY prom board and don't have a clue myself. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:23 am Post subject: sons car. |
|
|
Thanks
guys we will be looking forward to getting together at some point. I just hpe the kids car is running then.
Its taken a while to get to this point.
so what do you guys think about the cam and the heads we are using?
lt4 hot cam, 305 heads ported with bigger vales 52cc
roller rockers
pistons are silvolite .060 over 70 cc dish.
stock tpi stuff from the 305.
is 28lb injectors to big???
I have been looking at them on e-bay.
thanks
scott |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
28 might be a little large. 22 or 24 would probably be about right.
The hotcam in a 305 might be a little much for TPI, tpi really optomizes itself around 3850rpm, and tends to fall off about 4500rpm. Something in the range of 206*-212* intake duration at .050" is a pretty good match for TPI, the 90-92 G92 305's (the ones that made the most power) came stock with a L98 cam (IIRC, its about 202* intake). You don't really want to go much bigger with TPI. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:37 am Post subject: cam |
|
|
4800, hummm
I was not going to exceed 6,500 maybe 7,000
and the kid wanted a realy nasty lop to the idal.
So I said here ya go... but your gass milage will be nasty.
Although we could go with a big mouth set up, but Iam not sure I want to do that yet. Could always put it on later. It will be interesting to see how the heads work out as well.
So I guess we will see what happens ,
Right now I just need it running. Ive got two months I and would like to see him driving it by then .
thanks
scott |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scott, most of the computer controlled cars, don't get the rumpity idle, just like the hot cam, the LSA is wide enough, that you don't get that nasty overlap that gives it the idle. Really the solution to give it some good top end, is to ditch the TPI in favor of something like Holley Stealth-Ram, or a TPIs Miniram. Even if you go with a big port TPI setup, it has a fatal flaw, that is the runner length. The harmonic resonance tuning that gives TPI its name, uses the runner length to tune powerband for the 3500-4500 rpm range, but that tuning starts to work against itself above that range, cuasing a very in-efficiant intake system for upper RPM breathing. The hot cam, with a HSR and some good heads, could be a pretty brutall combo on a 305, it would really rip in the upper RPMs. It just isn't going to do that with TPI.
Although, tuning we can help with. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:49 am Post subject: cam |
|
|
Well , I have been reading lots on the cams but they didn't make it sound so bad.
I do rember a few people that liked the hot cam.
But its not to late to chage, yet. We still could change the cam.
Iam useing a 350 short block .060 over, the 305 heads have been worked over realy good ported and polished bigger stainless valves, high lift springs and all that stuff.
But I think he wants to stay with the tpi set up.
So now I don't know if Iam going to go with that cam or not.
I would like to get 300 hp to the rear wheels, or just under that.
whats your suggestion, with keeping the heads I have and useing the tpi I have.
I calculated the heads and dished piston to be right at 10-1
thanks
scott |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ahh, I didn't realise this was on a 350, I for some reason thought it was a 305.
That hot cam is not huge for a 350, probably not "ideal" for TPI, but not so bad.
THIS CAM orTHIS CAM would be a pretty good choice, it should be a solid performer, and is a hair smaller on the duration that the hotcam. But has a good ammount of lift. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:37 am Post subject: Cam |
|
|
That’s ok..
It’s a 350 short block with the reworked 305 heads.
I decided not to stick the 305 back in.
Maybe I will put it in my Old K5 blazer (its about had it)
I found a Washington state patrol car short block that had about 30,000 on it.
It had a broken ring.
That’s why I had to go .060 over.
That’s where it all started.
Originally I was going all stock on the 305 then at some point things got complicated, and BAM......I have a 350.....Kid must have been whispering in my ear.
What do you think about the horse power???
Thanks
Scott |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
300 to the wheels is a pretty tall order for TPI, 300hp crank should be doable though, with a good cam, TPI really doesn't do high in the HP numbers, because it was designed to make low-mid range torque, you will see some big torque numbers from TPI with the right cam and heads. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 1:28 pm Post subject: hp |
|
|
Ya I thought it may take some doing.
I didn't want that peanut cam in 350, that was in the 305.
So do you still think 26lb injectors ar to big??
I have been looking at some on e-bay but not quite sure what style will work for us.
thanks
scott |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 1:13 pm Post subject: kids 1st car |
|
|
Thought Id keep ya up to date on this.
This Sat. we put the short block together. Everything looks good, went together smooth. Except the engine builder pressed one of the pistons on 180 off, had to take them back down and have it turned around. Man that doesn't make me feel to good as I had them bore the block, but everything else checked out.
ordered stainless roller rockers today 3/8 by 1.5 when they get here we will put the re-worked heads on.
I want to have it in and running in 4 weeks.
Heck who knows, we might make it.
thanks
scott and son |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CheezX Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 90
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know I didn't really prove this on the dyno but I believe 300hp at the wheels on a 350 is very achievable with a long tube TPI setup. It will need an aftermarket base and runners (preferably AS&M/TPIS runners, not a casting). They're a little bit shorter and will bump the RPM range up a bit, and flow isn't a problem. Good heads, well matched cam, and exhaust. All the usual stuff.
I know mine died after 4400 rpm but that wasn't because of the intake. I fixed the problems (no more broken stuff or black/blue smoke) and ended up with a 17% increase in the VE tables above 4k rpm. Peak power is now between 5200-5600 rpm and that would be a rough estimate of 380-400rwhp. This isn't backed up by track times or dyno numbers but the old VE curve matched the dyno numbers closely and the new numbers are close to Desktop Dyno numbers (yeah I know ) so I'd call it a good estimate.
Actually take the old numbers 340rwhp x 350ci/400ci and you get 300rwhp. And you'd have to do it at 4400rpm x 400/350 = 5000rpm. Its in the range with room to spare. Match it all up and you're good to go. The only problem is you probably wouldn't get that lopey idle your son is looking for, instead it would get stock gas milage and drive well at low speed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|