View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
PonchoTA Member
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 342 Location: Halfway between Malibu and Santa Barbara!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | You ever painted your wheels to match the same color of your car.
|
some camaros got them like that, stock.
Quote: | You push your car through the staging lanes. |
Both, myself and twilightoptics are guilty of this one.
Quote: | You have to find a way to drive AROUND speed bumps in a parking lot. |
i don't have to, but i prefer to.
Quote: | You have more stereo WATTS than engine TORQUE! |
i guess i better pony up the cash for 1000 ft/lbs
Quote: | You spent $5,000 on the engine and you can not out run a stock Camaro |
not even going to comment on that one.... mike can you beat a stock SS ?
Quote: | If it takes you 8000rpm to reach 30mph from a dead stop at WOT. |
4.11's |
|
Back to top |
|
|
84transam383 Banned
Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 431 Location: bend, or
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2004 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
hey i have 4.10s |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TecherB Princess B
Joined: 14 Jan 2004 Posts: 390 Location: Some place between gresham and portland
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2004 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | If the 1970 Plymouth Daytona Superbird has a smaller spoiler than your car does.
You have a front wing. |
i seen a few that have both of these
Quote: | If you have ever claimed that switching to a cone filter has given you more than 5 HP. |
i see V8 guys try to claim this
Quote: | If you think that 180 horsepower and 185 lb/ft of torque are impressive for a ‘mildly’ modified engine. |
a lot of our stock cars could beat this one
-bart |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2004 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
TecherB wrote: | Quote: | If you think that 180 horsepower and 185 lb/ft of torque are impressive for a ‘mildly’ modified engine. |
a lot of our stock cars could beat this one |
even a poorly running LO3 will beat that. the almight LHO might even have a chance at that one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jess Administrator
Joined: 24 Nov 2003 Posts: 426 Location: Mount Vernon, WA
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2004 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | The dealer laughs when you bring your car back in for service under warranty, and you've only had it 6 months... |
I can see some LS1 guys getting that type of reaction |
|
Back to top |
|
|
90RSrocks Member
Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 421 Location: Klamath Falls, Oregon
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | You ever painted your wheels to match the same color of your car. | Mine came like that, stock.
Quote: | You have to find a way to drive AROUND speed bumps in a parking lot. | I always try.
Quote: | You have more stereo WATTS than engine TORQUE! | I only have to match 200 watts, so about 20 ft/lbs more than stock.
Dewey316 wrote: | TecherB wrote: | Quote: | If you think that 180 horsepower and 185 lb/ft of torque are impressive for a ‘mildly’ modified engine. | a lot of our stock cars could beat this one | even a poorly running LO3 will beat that. the almight LHO might even have a chance at that one. | LMAO, yeah I'm sure I've beaten better cars than that around town. It depends alot on the driver, the condition of the car, and how hard you want to push your machine compared to how much he values his machine. I tend to baby mine most of the time, just to minimize down-time mainly. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Project_1986_TA Member
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 198 Location: Burien/Seatac
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2004 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | If you equate the sound of performance with the sound of a Weed Eater™ |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|