| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RK82 Member

Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 168 Location: vancouver B.C
1982 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:04 pm Post subject: cooling issue |
|
|
well kind of a cooling issue, I want the car to run at 170-180 is where my butt dyno tells me the car runs best, but no-matter what I do it runs at 190-195 and feels kinda sluggish.
the cooling system is pretty much stock except for a mr. gasket 180 T-stat and maradyne texas twister fan.
anyone have any ideas, I've tried a few different things with same results, the only thing I haven't done is tried a 160 T-stat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've got a 180t-stat and a modded 350, stock fans and mine stays at 185 all day long.
Might think about gauge accuracy. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The gauge isn't gonna cause loss of power at higher temps, though. My guess would be low timing, or a lousy tune. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RK82 Member

Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 168 Location: vancouver B.C
1982 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| aaron_sK wrote: | | The gauge isn't gonna cause loss of power at higher temps, though. My guess would be low timing, or a lousy tune. |
I never thought of low timing I'll have check next time I fire it up but I think its set at 12* initial, 18* mechanical.
I forgot to mention above it also has a off-idle hesitation once it get up to 190, it dosen't do it at lower temps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He did say butt dyno. Cars are always faster cold.
Are we dealing with EFI are carb here? _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RK82 Member

Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 168 Location: vancouver B.C
1982 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| carb, Edelbrock 600 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Aren't those carbs particularly susceptible to heat soak because of the position of the fuel bowls? Might be time for a nice phenolic spacer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RK82 Member

Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 168 Location: vancouver B.C
1982 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aaron_sK wrote: | | Aren't those carbs particularly susceptible to heat soak because of the position of the fuel bowls? Might be time for a nice phenolic spacer. |
already have a 1" in there, I took it out the last few weeks I drove the car just to see, it seemed to have more grunt at higher RPMs but the temp issue was still there.
you think a 1/2" spacer would make a difference |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What material is the spacer? Aluminum does nothing for heat soak. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RK82 Member

Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 168 Location: vancouver B.C
1982 Pontiac Trans Am
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Plastic is better but phenolic is perfect.
Check timing again.
Make sure the coolant looks good too. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RK82 Member

Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 168 Location: vancouver B.C
1982 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Twilightoptics wrote: | Plastic is better but phenolic is perfect.
Check timing again.
Make sure the coolant looks good too. |
I thought the one I bought was phenolic plastic? so the phenolic wood fiber ones are better?
I was looking at them but the thought of a hot intake, wood, and gas made me kinda nervous, I've always used a 1" spacer besides hood clearance would getting a 1/2" be better?
the coolants only a couple months old, and I'll play with the timing again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The wood kind are fine. I ran a Summit 1/2" phenolic on the 390, and it helped a lot. I would have gone thicker, but that engine barely fits under the hood as it is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RK82 Member

Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 168 Location: vancouver B.C
1982 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ok, I think I'll try a 1/2" wood fiber spacer and a 160 T-stat, I figure with a 160 using the rule that thermostats work within a 12* +/- of what there rated at, it should run around 170 right where it likes it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BluFbdy Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 915 Location: Port Orchard WA
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
not that anyone cares about it that much but your car will get crappy mileage, plus i THINK....dont quote me on this that the open/closed loop cutoff is around 170 ish, my car was going balistic when i got it up here from as cuz i had the 160*, down there it ran at around 180* but its obviously not as hot up here so it kept going thru the cycles and confusing itself, killing my gas mileage lol ive got a 190* in now and i sit aorund 200*, not great for power but its the winter time so im not too worried about it _________________ If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BluFbdy wrote: | | the open/closed loop cutoff is around 170 |
Closed Loop Enable Temp Deg F : 104.45
Somehow I don't think his Edelbrock carb will mind too much though.
The stock ECM needs the stock thermostat. If you are planning on keeping the EFI, you'd be better off in the long run to start burning chips, and then just run a proper stat instead of the emissions one. The car will go into closed loop, but it will still run rich as crap.
Also, I have found that 160* stats are a bit to low on even a carbed car around here. Never heat up, just sit at 150* all day. Cheap to try, though.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BluFbdy Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 915 Location: Port Orchard WA
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I said don't quote me lol but yeah I had to get rid of my 160* because my car haaaaated it _________________ If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RK82 Member

Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 168 Location: vancouver B.C
1982 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| aaron_sK wrote: | | BluFbdy wrote: | | the open/closed loop cutoff is around 170 |
Closed Loop Enable Temp Deg F : 104.45
Somehow I don't think his Edelbrock carb will mind too much though.
The stock ECM needs the stock thermostat. If you are planning on keeping the EFI, you'd be better off in the long run to start burning chips, and then just run a proper stat instead of the emissions one. The car will go into closed loop, but it will still run rich as crap.
Also, I have found that 160* stats are a bit to low on even a carbed car around here. Never heat up, just sit at 150* all day. Cheap to try, though.  |
ya, no ECM in my car, I think it'll be ok  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiveoformula Member

Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1799 Location: OR
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You also got your heat to worry about. Is your heater working ok when the cars at 160ish? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RK82 Member

Joined: 27 Jul 2008 Posts: 168 Location: vancouver B.C
1982 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| my car doesn't have a heater in it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|