View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
fiveoformula Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1799 Location: OR
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thought I'd bring this back up for descusion...
So I have a totally new bin on a 512 chip now. I toasted the stock chip I guess because it won't work, the car runs pretty smooth but even with a totally new chip, Im still getting the pop in high RPM's (sometimes). For kicks an giggles I tried taking the air filter off and driving around today and it even popped this time with no filter.
I have been trying to get a grip on tuning for less fuel but I have been unsuccessful so far.
I also don't have a way to datalog since theres something wrong with my laptop's battery and it won't power up unless it's plugged in to a wall.
Im kinda thinking this is a mechanical issue seeing as it has the same problem with two chips, but then again its still fat rich. opinions? lol _________________
'88 FORMULA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Two chips... but are you using the stock bin for your car? Or another one on the burned chip?
When it pops, what does the WB say?
I forget, intake pop or exhaust pop? _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fiveoformula wrote: | I also don't have a way to datalog since theres something wrong with my laptop's battery and it won't power up unless it's plugged in to a wall. |
Buy a 12V/110V inverter. Totally worth it when you're datalogging for a few days. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Al Hasse Member
Joined: 19 Nov 2005 Posts: 4379 Location: Bremerton, WA
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aaron_sK wrote: | fiveoformula wrote: | I also don't have a way to datalog since theres something wrong with my laptop's battery and it won't power up unless it's plugged in to a wall. |
Buy a 12V/110V inverter. Totally worth it when you're datalogging for a few days. |
Like this one
_________________ 92 Camaro
89 Camaro
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiveoformula Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1799 Location: OR
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Twilightoptics wrote: | Two chips... but are you using the stock bin for your car? Or another one on the burned chip?
When it pops, what does the WB say?
I forget, intake pop or exhaust pop? |
Its more of an intake pop, usually the WB is maxed at 10.0 but other times maybe 10.2-10.5.
The bin im using now is totally different, Dewey found it for me somewhere online because I never got to laod my stock chip onto my laptop before I toasted it.
Today I grabbed a scanner to check the live data. A few interesting things I found was my TPS voltage at WOT was only 4.3.
My block learn was at 109, trying to cut the fuel big time.
And my coolant temp sensor was picking up 156* while gauge read about 190*-200* This was today when it was about 90* outside, warmed up with the fan & A/C on.
Is any of this interesting? lol |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiveoformula Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1799 Location: OR
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good call on the inverter, I can't believe I didn't think of that. I will have to get the cigarette lighter working too lol |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fiveoformula wrote: | And my coolant temp sensor was picking up 156* while gauge read about 190*-200* This was today when it was about 90* outside, warmed up with the fan & A/C on.
Is any of this interesting? lol |
In my experience, when the CTS fails, it goes to it's max low setting (like -36*F or some BS). To low of a reading can cause it to run rich, bit not 10:1 rich. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiveoformula Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1799 Location: OR
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thats what I thought, Marc and I were talking, thinking that maybe it's so rich because im running the TPI fuel pump? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pump wouldn't matter, unless you had a bad regulator, or the return lines was a restriction.
I'm running a TPI pump in my car, going on 5 years, its never been an issue. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiveoformula Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1799 Location: OR
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I thought that most people who used it didn't have an issue, and the regulator is fairly new since I rebuilt and cleaned the throttle body about a year ago. Is that TPS voltage a bit on the low side? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiveoformula Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1799 Location: OR
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have been reading up on TGO about fueling a little bit. Is it the BPW constant that I need to adjust to lean it out a bit? or is that only going to effect Idle? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
THe BPW costant IIRC for TBI is bascially telling it the Injector Size for laymans terms.
If you adjust that, it changes fueling EVERYWHERE.
Kinda wonder if you have an intake valve on it's way out. Since your valve seals are shot and have been for so long, deposts can get in there and cause it not to close. That could also cause your intake backfire. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiveoformula Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1799 Location: OR
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I hadn't thought of that, but I suppose it's possible, I actually got around to changing them a few months ago, every cylinder had good leakdown from what I remember. I still have never done a compression check though, just because I know how much of a pain it is on our cars. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Leakdown is no easier than a compression test? Same fitting in sparkplug hole _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiveoformula Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1799 Location: OR
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know but, I happened to have the leakdown kit hooked up to fill the cylinders with air when I did the seals. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Were you popping then?
Leakdown is the best representation of the chamber sealing.
For shizzle in gizzzle. Retard the distributor 6 degrees and go see if you can get it to pop. Popping out the intake is too advanced timing, or lean, or an intake valve. Don't suppose you got a rocker a bit too tight when doing the seals? You could have the possability for high oil pressure under high rpm, that causes the lifter to pump up a little bit and hang the valve open if it's set too tight. Mike ran into this, but this was with aftermarket parts. Very rare to see it on a stock rig. That's why I always tighten the rocker down <1/4 turn.
It is possible, however, that if you're pegging the WB rich, that the plugs can either foul and or not spark all the time from excess fuel... in which case can pre-ignite in later rpms at the wrong time. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiveoformula Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1799 Location: OR
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now that you say that, I think maybe I did adjust the rockers to tight. I don't know if it's accurate but my oil pressure gauge has been doing some funny things since then too. Can that have done some damage over-tightening them? or can I just re-adjust the valves and it should be good?
I can't remember now if it popped before I did the seals... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mangus Member
Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 254 Location: @computer in garage (Bothell)
1989 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fiveoformula wrote: | I have been reading up on TGO about fueling a little bit. Is it the BPW constant that I need to adjust to lean it out a bit? or is that only going to effect Idle? |
Not sure what mask you're running, and I admit I haven't read the entire thread, but if this is only happening at WOT, note that WOT has its own fueling calibration parameters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiveoformula Member
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1799 Location: OR
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At the risk of sounding really dumb, which tables are those?
It's the $4D mask
Last edited by fiveoformula on Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:39 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mangus Member
Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 254 Location: @computer in garage (Bothell)
1989 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fiveoformula wrote: | At the risk of sounding really dumb, which tables are those? |
At the risk of sounding uninformed, which mask ID are you running? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|