| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 2:28 pm Post subject: Too retarded (the timing, not me!) |
|
|
What would be the symptoms of my ignition timing being extremely retarded? Last weekend James and I set the base timing (with the est unhooked) to 0 degreees as specified by the emissions sticker. As most of you know I had a serious lack of power problem. So today I decided I would mess with the distributor and set the timing by ear. I advanced the timing alot (20 or more degrees) 'til the idle smoothed out. I only drove it around my apartment parking lot 'cause I don't have tabs, but the power seems to have improved quite a bit. So maybe my timing chain is off a tooth? Stretched perhaps? Balancer slipping on inner ring? Or maybe the timing is way advanced now? Any ideas?  _________________ '86 Trans Am - 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6
'85 Camaro Berlinetta - IROC clone
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The initial or overall?
Initial timing being to low will result in a dog off the line, and long crank tmes
Overall too low will result in crap mileage, and a power dropoff.
Have you confirmed with a timing light that the ecm is advancing the timing properly? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The ecm controls the overall timing right? So yeah, I'm referring to initial (base) timing. I don't know what you mean by "properly", but with the est hooked up, yes it does advance the timing as the revs go up. I do know one thing we f'ed up however. We set base timing at 0 degrees however stock (remember its a 2.8L) is 10 degrees BTDC. It is probably around 15 to 20 degrees BTDC now. Would 10 degrees of retard be enough to create the problems I've been having? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kurfbird Member
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 866 Location: Whidbey Island
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 5:24 pm Post subject: Timing |
|
|
TDC your Number 1 Cylinder and see if the timing mark lines up correctly.
I normally pull the # 1 plug and ether hold my finger over the hole. Or wad up a paper towel (to plug the hole) and tap the engine and the paper towel will come out . Then look to see if your timing marks line up. _________________ kurfbird
1991 Camaro 3.1 v6
1991 Firebird 3.1 v6
1992 Formula 350 5.7
700r4 Transmissions
brucesthirdgenparts.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RSFreak wrote: | | I don't know what you mean by "properly", but with the est hooked up, yes it does advance the timing as the revs go up. |
You infer correctly, sir. You should be able to watch the timing go from 16~20 up to around ~38 while you rev the engine with the EST plugged in.
| RSFreak wrote: | | do know one thing we f'ed up however. We set base timing at 0 degrees however stock (remember its a 2.8L) is 10 degrees BTDC. It is probably around 15 to 20 degrees BTDC now. |
Why so low? Trying to get it past emissions? I run (IIRC) about 15* on the S10. That has old-school dizzy with heavier springs though.
| RSFreak wrote: | | 10 degrees of retard be enough to create the problems I've been having? |
Put it at 12* before, drink a beer, do a burnout, compare.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can't really test it on the street since it has no tabs!
My real question is could the timing being set at 0 degrees as opposed to 10 degrees cause my loss of power problems?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boostd1 12sec Club

Joined: 28 Oct 2008 Posts: 437 Location: Thornton, Colorado
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RSFreak wrote: | I can't really test it on the street since it has no tabs!
My real question is could the timing being set at 0 degrees as opposed to 10 degrees cause my loss of power problems?  |
Of course! Lol.
Many dyno shops consider 1* of ignition timing +- ~3WHP. _________________ 1998 Grand Prix GT | 12.91 @ 103 - Sold/Retired
2008 Saturn Astra XR | Sold
2007 Infiniti G35x | Current DD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
really depend on the motor for the timing..... Dont know about the whole dyno theory but I have personally seen a 50hp jump with each degree that I ramped in on the last drag car I built. Course it was a 605Ci ford that was in the quadruple digits anyways but still. Timing affects everything! _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| izcain wrote: | | really depend on the motor for the timing..... Dont know about the whole dyno theory but I have personally seen a 50hp jump with each degree that I ramped in on the last drag car I built. Course it was a 605Ci ford that was in the quadruple digits anyways but still. Timing affects everything! |
VERY much depends on the engine. My engine made the same power with 30-32-34-36-38 deg WOT timing. The more efficent the cylinder head, the less timing comes into play.
You CANNOT verify the timing marks but using the starter, it's way too inaccurate. You have to use a piston stop if the heads are on.
It's very possible the balancer slipped on the rubber.
Which motor setup is this? Remember to find the proper #1 also. It's not always forward on the drivers-side. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kurfbird Member
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 866 Location: Whidbey Island
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 1:48 pm Post subject: timing |
|
|
Which motor setup is this? Remember to find the proper #1 also. It's not always forward on the drivers-side.[/quote]
If I rember correctly a v6 is on the passenger side _________________ kurfbird
1991 Camaro 3.1 v6
1991 Firebird 3.1 v6
1992 Formula 350 5.7
700r4 Transmissions
brucesthirdgenparts.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boostd1 12sec Club

Joined: 28 Oct 2008 Posts: 437 Location: Thornton, Colorado
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah I'm not talking about a 1000+ HP V8...lol
LS1 rear-world dyno testing shows about a 3-4WHP improvement per * of timing advance. So, on a fairly stock engine, 3-4 WHP is about right.
But also the the OP, too much timing can cause loss of power because the motor is being very inefficient and it is most likely knocking, resulting in less overall ignition timing. Also, excessive timing advance shows up as a high NOx reading, although you probably cannot test this without going to DEQ. _________________ 1998 Grand Prix GT | 12.91 @ 103 - Sold/Retired
2008 Saturn Astra XR | Sold
2007 Infiniti G35x | Current DD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Twilightoptics wrote: | | izcain wrote: | | really depend on the motor for the timing..... Dont know about the whole dyno theory but I have personally seen a 50hp jump with each degree that I ramped in on the last drag car I built. Course it was a 605Ci ford that was in the quadruple digits anyways but still. Timing affects everything! |
VERY much depends on the engine. My engine made the same power with 30-32-34-36-38 deg WOT timing. The more efficent the cylinder head, the less timing comes into play.
You CANNOT verify the timing marks but using the starter, it's way too inaccurate. You have to use a piston stop if the heads are on.
It's very possible the balancer slipped on the rubber.
Which motor setup is this? Remember to find the proper #1 also. It's not always forward on the drivers-side. |
Piston Design also comes into play for timing and how fast the flame travels across the piston and what the domes and shapes are inside the combustion chamber. _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 5:01 pm Post subject: Re: timing |
|
|
| kurfbird wrote: | | Quote: | | Which motor setup is this? Remember to find the proper #1 also. It's not always forward on the drivers-side. |
If I rember correctly a v6 is on the passenger side |
Correct. Pass. forward is #1 on a 60* V6. Like a Furd.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yup, its a 2.8L V6. #1 is forward pass side. I'm not a complete noob! That being said, prior to this car all of my experience had been with SBCs. I had a hell of a time setting timing when I thought #1 on the V6 was front driver side! 
Last edited by RSFreak on Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:43 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John, I would never imply that.
...much...
A very thick piece of straight wire (I use 6ga house wire) dropped down the spark plug hole can be used to estimate TDC if you don't want to buy or build a dead-stop. Hold one end of the wire while cranking the engine back and forth a little and you should be able to find the center of the cylinder dwell pretty easy.
Or burnouts, as I suggested earlier  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't crank, turn it over by hand. Half the time because of compression, the motor wont stop when you let off the key. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aaron_sK wrote: | John, I would never imply that.
...much...
A very thick piece of straight wire (I use 6ga house wire) dropped down the spark plug hole can be used to estimate TDC if you don't want to buy or build a dead-stop. Hold one end of the wire while cranking the engine back and forth a little and you should be able to find the center of the cylinder dwell pretty easy.
Or burnouts, as I suggested earlier  |
I disagree, if the balancer is off alot its slipping.. its a time bomb. Replace it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
The balancer on my '85 Z28 slipped off the hub. Sucked trying pull the hub off the crank snout. Stripped two gear pullers!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I pull all of the spark plugs out, turn it over by hand, and then poke something in the #1 hole until the piston is at the top. Then you have to make sure it's at the right TDC. That will make sure nothing weird is going on with the balancer. Could be the balancer slipped or maybe the key sheared a little. Pretty easy to check. Might as well. I've played a lot with the V6's. _________________ E30
86 RS - 7.4L V8 SOLD
89 RS - 3.25L V6 REMOVED
89 RS - 5.7L LT1 SOLD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| blue89 wrote: | | I pull all of the spark plugs out, turn it over by hand, and then poke something in the #1 hole until the piston is at the top. Then you have to make sure it's at the right TDC. That will make sure nothing weird is going on with the balancer. Could be the balancer slipped or maybe the key sheared a little. Pretty easy to check. Might as well. I've played a lot with the V6's. |
LOL the piston stop isn't TDC... it's X degrees before TDC. Rotate it the other way and you'll be the same X degrees ATDC. You need to make marks at both, and tdc is in the middle. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|