| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Hypothetically speaking... |
| Buy an old schooler (pre-85), you won't get it past |
|
12% |
[ 2 ] |
| Buy a newer car, you'll be fine |
|
12% |
[ 2 ] |
| Don't be stupid, spend your money on beer and drive your Fords |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Bacon! |
|
75% |
[ 12 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 16 |
|
| Author |
Message |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 7:09 pm Post subject: A hypothetical question |
|
|
So lets say hypothetically I were to be looking for a certain color of a certain type of automobile manufactured by a certain company with a certain optional removable roof.
And lets say I was contemplating an engine with an induction system that was not entirely [/natural[/i].
In addition, lets say that I live in stupid Pierce county where I have to pass sniffer and dyno roller (but NOT visual) tests for CO and HC (but NOT NOx) to get a vehicle registered.
Would said non-natural aspiration (of the single variety) be theoretically able to pass emissions, or should I find a pre-86 car? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What motor? With how high our emissions limits are a newer motor shouldn't have any trouble passing. I have no cats and passed with almost half the limits. _________________
| Quote: | | Sometimes I actually think I'm slightly retarded in the mouth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Single turbo. Newer motor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Way to be vague.
Obd1? 2? Canbus? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
obd2
maf motor
single turbo
Vaguery (<-- not actually a word) is the spice of life.
That and a good oatmeal stout.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
You were so vague I had to vote "Bacon!"  _________________ '86 Trans Am - 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6
'85 Camaro Berlinetta - IROC clone
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flea Member

Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 1246 Location: Raymond WA
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
mmm Bacon
 _________________ Killing mailboxes since 2009 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I voted "Bacon" since it sounds like your hinting at a bright pink miata convertable, with a single turbo.
I would have voted "beer and Fords" but you only have one ford, the other is a Mercury _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QwkTrip 11sec Club

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
+1
Bacon really was the best choice given the situation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kutison Member

Joined: 09 Dec 2008 Posts: 222 Location: Troutdale, OR
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dlp Member
Joined: 28 Mar 2005 Posts: 374 Location: Bothell, Wa
1990 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Solstice? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A newer obd2 motor with cylinder specific fuel trims should have no problem passing thirdgen emission levels. Even if it doesn't you can tell the state it's a motor swap and then just have to pass the no-code obd2 style emission test. _________________
| Quote: | | Sometimes I actually think I'm slightly retarded in the mouth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| iansane wrote: | | Even if it doesn't you can tell the state it's a motor swap and then just have to pass the no-code obd2 style emission test. |
Queue?
So you could tell Olympia to test your Bird as a new Chevy Silverado?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| In layman's terms, yes. You have to pass the emissions standards of the motor, not the chassis. Which is the plug-in-and-go method. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting...
The PCM and engine would be from a late 90's car, if my mad plan were to come to fruition. My plan was to chip out all the stupid stuff, and run a straight pipe through a Magnaflow.
Ian, do you know of anyone whose successfully done this kind of DMV trickery? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One of the guys that used to work at my shop swapped a k series Honda motor into his 89 civic and did it that way. He didn't try tuning it to pass emissions though. Just the obd2 scan method. I think it would've passed with a highflow cat and decent computer work
However, what makes you think yours won't pass the sniffer if properly set up? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wasn't planning on running a cat due to the turbo. Suppose I could rig one in there Paul-style.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Even without a cat it should pass thirdgen standards. Mine passed with the exhaust dumping out the side! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tru dat.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mine passed the sniffer test with no emissions gear what-so-ever!  _________________ '86 Trans Am - 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6
'85 Camaro Berlinetta - IROC clone
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|