| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cameron7710 Member

Joined: 13 Apr 2008 Posts: 813 Location: shoreline,Wa
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:29 pm Post subject: lt1 swap |
|
|
well my old 305 has so many miles on it i think that its retirement is coming soon so iv been thinking about a lt1 swap would be my best choice for a good daily driver that can get down the track real quick. as of now im just trying to figure what all i need for the swap and saving up the cash for the swap (if i can ever find a dam job ) any way first off what im trying to do is just get it in later ill start the mods
so far i know that i have to do something for the fuel lines and power steering lines also need a better fuel pump and i know that i cant run AC but thats know big deal my bigest problem im seeing is wiring the harness up cause well i have no idea how to do that i ust dont get wireing at all so if some one could explan the basics of what i would need to do that would be great _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wiring is the biggest hurdle. AC delete pulley from the dealer, custom fab a radiator mount or figure out how to deal with the factory lines, you can only use 2 of the 3 engine mount holes on the passenger side. It's a pretty straight forward swap aside from the wiring. _________________ E30
86 RS - 7.4L V8 SOLD
89 RS - 3.25L V6 REMOVED
89 RS - 5.7L LT1 SOLD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
not to be the destructor of dreams, but for someone in your position a good well built Gen 1 SBC will scoot as well as a stock LT1 for nearly the same price.
I am satisfied with my vortec headed Gen I 350. it made comparable dyno numbers to a stock LT1 with only a basic tune. Scoots the car along fine, and has power on reserve when I want it.
not to be the killer of dreams, but I have not seen an LT1 that has outdone an G1 SBC with the same amount into into it. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cameron7710 Member

Joined: 13 Apr 2008 Posts: 813 Location: shoreline,Wa
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quasi-Traction wrote: | not to be the destructor of dreams, but for someone in your position a good well built Gen 1 SBC will scoot as well as a stock LT1 for nearly the same price.
I am satisfied with my vortec headed Gen I 350. it made comparable dyno numbers to a stock LT1 with only a basic tune. Scoots the car along fine, and has power on reserve when I want it.
not to be the killer of dreams, but I have not seen an LT1 that has outdone an G1 SBC with the same amount into into it. | well yes i have thought about this and i know that the the gen 1 sbc can really move with some work but the things that really make me like the lt1 is for gas milage and that it pass emissions test and i know that the lt1s can get a good 20-25 mpg and still make some good power so theses are my main reasons for the lt1 swap.
but i do know that with a gen 1 i can make good power plus it would be an easier swap but i dont think i could make the same kind of power with thoses kind of mpg numbers _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
It all depends on the tune and what kind of fueling you have on the motor. You can do everything (and in my opinion more) with a gen 1 engine. No one says you have to run a gen 1 with a carb. It's whatever your make of it. _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alphius Peanut

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cameron7710 wrote: | | Quasi-Traction wrote: | not to be the destructor of dreams, but for someone in your position a good well built Gen 1 SBC will scoot as well as a stock LT1 for nearly the same price.
I am satisfied with my vortec headed Gen I 350. it made comparable dyno numbers to a stock LT1 with only a basic tune. Scoots the car along fine, and has power on reserve when I want it.
not to be the killer of dreams, but I have not seen an LT1 that has outdone an G1 SBC with the same amount into into it. | well yes i have thought about this and i know that the the gen 1 sbc can really move with some work but the things that really make me like the lt1 is for gas milage and that it pass emissions test and i know that the lt1s can get a good 20-25 mpg and still make some good power so theses are my main reasons for the lt1 swap.
but i do know that with a gen 1 i can make good power plus it would be an easier swap but i dont think i could make the same kind of power with thoses kind of mpg numbers |
I have had both. A stock-ish LT1 and a mild built Gen1 350.
The LT1 had an auto, exhaust, intake, and tune. 3.23 geared.
I got a best of 20mpg with that engine on the freeway with the TC locked. Also pulled dead even on the freeway with a newer LS1-T56 GTO.
The older Camaro was slightly faster than that with the first engine I built.
350, decent cam, Quadrajet, shorty headers, 5-speed. Big valves and slight port work on decent smog-era heads.
It got 21-22mpg if I accelerated like a little old lady. (Not like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDSF-tB4xxw)
Current motor is faster yet and gets 17mpg on a good day.
I have way more money in my Gen1 now than a stock used LT1. Back then, it was really close.
The LT1 responds very well to freed-up exhaust and intake, even on stock internals. Add to that a little tuning and you're at 330ish hp with a $1000 engine.
I would say if you want to have fuel injection and learn about tuning and stuff, go for the LT1. It's a wonderful beginning platform, and it is easy to mod. Sounds like you need to pass emissions too... only a sniffer? Expect to learn at least a little about computer tuning to get the most out of the engine. There's people on here who can help you learn some of that stuff.
If you would rather not do computer tuning, and you just want power cheaply, go for the Gen1 with a GOOD carb. (Read: Not an Edelbrock. )
I like and recommend the LT1. Never done one in a thirdgen though...
Whatever you do, make sure you're prepared to learn. It won't be easy. Good luck, and there's always plenty of help here if you get stuck. _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
The 2 biggest downfalls of the LT1 that I have seen...
1. Weird ECM for almost every year.
2. The opti-spark. And replacing the opti-spark with a decent setup is not cheap.
Otherwise, it really is basically a standard SBC. If you understand wiring, it wont be that hard of setup. I have wired up a camaro motor into an s10. And, I am basically running a truck wireharness in my camaro.
But be warned, none of this is cheap. No heart transplant is cheap. _________________ 2008 GMC Z71
1991 Camaro RS Vert
1972 Jimmy 4x4
20ft Longhorn Car Hauler
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Even in stock form with the crap manifolds the LT1 still put down 275hp right? And the Opti-spark is only a problem after high miles. Other than that it's a great distributor with far greater accuracy than a standard unit.
x2 on the weird year PCM's. The 94 is the one to get if you can find one.
93 is a 730 ecm just like a 3rd gen
94 is an obd0 like the 3rd gen but you can reflash the PCM through the ALDL port
95 is OBDII or 1.5 or whatever.
I thought mine was fairly easy to swap into a 3rd gen and a lot of fun to drive (see my sig). Add a cam and you're at 350hp easy. I say go for it as long as you can find the right year. _________________ E30
86 RS - 7.4L V8 SOLD
89 RS - 3.25L V6 REMOVED
89 RS - 5.7L LT1 SOLD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alphius Peanut

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| blue89 wrote: | Even in stock form with the crap manifolds the LT1 still put down 275hp right? And the Opti-spark is only a problem after high miles. Other than that it's a great distributor with far greater accuracy than a standard unit.
x2 on the weird year PCM's. The 94 is the one to get if you can find one.
93 is a 730 ecm just like a 3rd gen
94 is an obd0 like the 3rd gen but you can reflash the PCM through the ALDL port
95 is OBDII or 1.5 or whatever.
I thought mine was fairly easy to swap into a 3rd gen and a lot of fun to drive (see my sig). Add a cam and you're at 350hp easy. I say go for it as long as you can find the right year. |
Definitely '94. The stock reflashable PCM is just amazing. Tuning is basically free plus the cost of an ALDL cable. And no funky OBDII stuff to worry about hooking up correctly.
I think they were around 285hp with the stock restrictive junk.
The optispark on the 4thgen I had lasted until 130,000 miles, then replaced, then I got the car at 145,000 and it was fine 'til I wrecked it. _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Alphius wrote: | | The optispark on the 4thgen I had lasted until 130,000 miles, then replaced, then I got the car at 145,000 and it was fine 'til I wrecked it. |
Mine lasted 215k!! Died when I got a coolant leak right above it though. The 94's have an early version of the Opti-spark that doesn't like water. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alphius Peanut

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 9:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| blue89 wrote: | | Mine lasted 215k!! Died when I got a coolant leak right above it though. The 94's have an early version of the Opti-spark that doesn't like water. |
Yep. Mine was replaced due to a leaky waterpump killing it. It's all moisture problems with them. I'd like to know whose bright idea it was to put a critical ignition component right underneath the waterpump.  _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cameron7710 Member

Joined: 13 Apr 2008 Posts: 813 Location: shoreline,Wa
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks for all the info guys and yes i know it wont be easy and im up for a learning experience and i will need to learn how to tune fuel injection cause as far as i know i cant have a carb and pass emissions other wise i would probley just try building a 383 stroker, but then again i doubt id be able to pay for the gas . but ya im pretty set on the lt1 cause it just seams like i can make a good amount of power easy and pass emissions and at least keep the mpg im geting now.plus i just think that a well dressed lt1 would look sexxy under the hood lol and it seams like the swap will be pretty straight forward, with all the reseach iv done on tgo the only thing that im pretty much completely lost on is the wireing  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For the work involved why not go with the LS route. Your car is already and automatic, find a 5.3 take out with automatic tranny and wiring. You would be alot farther ahead with the LS platform than GM's bastard child LT1.
Just a thought. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rjmcgee wrote: | You would be alot farther ahead with the LS platform than GM's bastard child LT1.
Just a thought. |
I agree. The LT1 has some nice points, but if you are going to do a full on wiring/motor swap, go with the LS route. Otherwise, I would stay gen1. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cameron7710 Member

Joined: 13 Apr 2008 Posts: 813 Location: shoreline,Wa
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ya i never really thought about the ls motors cause iv never been able to find any plus i figured that they would cost a good chunk of change when an lt1 i can find pretty easily for a couple hundred bucks _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cameron7710 wrote: | | ya i never really thought about the ls motors cause iv never been able to find any plus i figured that they would cost a good chunk of change when an lt1 i can find pretty easily for a couple hundred bucks |
You don't have to buy an LS1, look at the truck motors. 5.3 and 6.0
I said 5.3 only cause I have seen some killer deals on those. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cameron7710 Member

Joined: 13 Apr 2008 Posts: 813 Location: shoreline,Wa
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rjmcgee wrote: | | cameron7710 wrote: | | ya i never really thought about the ls motors cause iv never been able to find any plus i figured that they would cost a good chunk of change when an lt1 i can find pretty easily for a couple hundred bucks |
You don't have to buy an LS1, look at the truck motors. 5.3 and 6.0
I said 5.3 only cause I have seen some killer deals on those. | i may be wrong on this but iv herd that u cant put a truck motor in a car and pass emissions cause my first plan was just to drop in a 350 tbi out of a 1990 suburban for sothin till i can get somthin better. but some one on tgo said its not emssions legal _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Letter of the law says you can't change the motor for any motor that is older then your car either. Even if its exactly the same or even better. In actuality if it looks pretty stock, and passes the sniffer you'll get away with it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chevymad wrote: | | Letter of the law says you can't change the motor for any motor that is older then your car either. Even if its exactly the same or even better. In actuality if it looks pretty stock, and passes the sniffer you'll get away with it. |
Exactly. I think even in Cali you can put anything newer in, as long as it passes your year sniffer.
Looked into this alot when I did my first V8 S-10. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rjmcgee wrote: | For the work involved why not go with the LS route. Your car is already and automatic, find a 5.3 take out with automatic tranny and wiring. You would be alot farther ahead with the LS platform than GM's bastard child LT1.
Just a thought. |
Quoted for truth. If I would have had the money at the time to do it I would have stuffed a 5.3 out of a Chevy Tahoe in my car. Would have exacerbated my tuning abilities though, and wasn't an viable option for me. But I'm all for LS based motors in third gens. Its GM's best V8 design to date. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|