| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mangus Member

Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 254 Location: @computer in garage (Bothell)
1989 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aaron -
If you find yourself up here towards Seattle, let me know. I'll walk you through it all and have you tuning and logging for your drive back to Tacoma. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pfft. If that's all it took then I'll call you as soon as my trans is back in the bird.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alloy T56 Elitist

Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 1716 Location: Vancouver, WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Twilightoptics wrote: | | Dan I didn't have to change anything to burn those chips with the burn 1 if they were stacked right from tunerpro. |
I didn't stack mine, I just read the instructions from Moates and no stacking required. One less step to bother with, one less thing to go wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I see. Never did it withoutstacking.
Well Aaron it's possible your definition file is bad, your original bin file is bad, or you have the chip in backward!
If you stack it can be the same file name. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
With the last chip I tried I actually tried dropping it into the ZIF socket both ways, so I'm pretty sure I don't have it in backwards.
It never occured to me that my XDF might be corrupt. I've tried several BIN files, some stock, some I edited. I was only using 6E files since I deleted the cold start, and it's fairly hard to start the car without it in good weather, much less the 38* outside temp right now.
I think I'm just gonna start trying some 32 BINs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Did you turn it on with it in backwards? I believe that toasts the chip. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
AHH! IT WORKS!
Burnt a bone stock 32 ABWT BIN (basically stock for the car, except different rear gear) threw codes, turned the SES light off, cranked and fired perfectly. Idles smooth, tons more torque.
I don't know what the difference is, but I stomped it at 2500 in second and went sliding sideways.
Now I'm gonna have to figure out why the 6E didn't fly, but I'm late for work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Schultzy89GTA M.R.A. (11sec Club)

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 4417 Location: Gresham, OR
1989 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
10 hour shift, meh. No time to play with my toys.
Tried a new 6E BIN tonight and it flashed the SES like it should. Didn't start it though... damn neighbors. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mangus Member

Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 254 Location: @computer in garage (Bothell)
1989 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If you don't have VATS, don't forget to disable it in the 6E bin. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|