| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:26 pm Post subject: Mmm... Hydrocarbons |
|
|
Took the IROC to emissions today...
| Quote: |
Cruise Emissions: HC: 80 (150) CO: 0.75 (1.00)
Idle Emissions: HC: 744 (220) CO: 0.25 (1.20)
|
Now what is going to cause my hydrocarbon emissions to jump almost ten times at idle? Their computer said my idle was about 1050rpms. My tach said more like 900.
I let the temp come up to around 215F, and the car had been running for about 90 minutes before the test. Gas was 91 octane Chevron.
Any ideas? Ian and I are at a loss on this one. Last years test was 70ppm for HC at idle, and the only thing I changed in the exhaust was the header and collector gaskets, and the O2 sensor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It will hold 40psi at the rail with the engine off for more than five minutes, so I doubt the injectors are leaking.
Wouldn't a bad cat cause an increase across the board, and not just at idle? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dunno. Raw HC count should be caused by unspent fuel going through the engine, which i interpet as either incomplete burn, poor atomization, too much valve overlap, or the cat is dirty.
Does the car think its running rich at idle? Whats the o2 sensor thinking? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not throwing any codes, but I don't have a reader for it.
Could the AFPR be causing it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Potentially? Depends I guess. Hopefully Dewey can comment on that. If the pressure is increased than engine will get more fuel than the computer intends, but it should compensate. If it can't compensate enough then it should throw a code. Just speculating. But if its higher/lower than stock I would return it to as close to stock as possible. Adjusting for larger injectors if need be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it may or may not.
It also depends on if the engine is actulay idling in closed loop. If you have more than stock pressure, go back to stock rating.
It is the same thing everyone else has said, the cat is suspect. It could just be that you are not getting enough heat into the cat at idle, to get the process to work in there. I would give it a tune up (new plugs, etc) and put the fuel pressure back to stock, and see what it does. You might also consider unplugging the cooling fan, to make sure that your temps are nice and hot when you test.
--John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm... okay.
My AFPR was installed and adjusted by some previous owner, and I haven't touched it since. With the vacuum applied it is around 43psi when the car is cold, and closer to 39 psi when it's hot. However when I pull the vacuum the pressure jumps up to around 55psi at the rail, and the car bogs.
No idea if the injectors or the pump are stock. There have been quite a few people through this car before I got it, and only some of them knew their stuff.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm. Just reading what you posted, sounds like you have a fuel related problem. Here's another one, how far away is your o2 sensor? Your headers may not be getting it hot enough (like dewey said).
If the V8's are like the V6's, you should be around 43 psi at idle. At 55psi with no vacuum, I would hope the engine would bog! Thats a huge difference in fuel pressure. Especially coming from 39psi at warm idle!
You can do the paperclip jumper test between A-B ports on the ALDL port with the car off. Start the car and the light should stay lite until it gets warm. Once its warm it will go off when the car is lean, on when rich. This will tell you if your in open loop or closed loop at idle. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
O2 is in a welded bung in the drivers side header, about an inch above the collector gasket.
A and B on the ALDL are 1 and 2, or the upper left pins, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
test the 1-2 pins and see what the sensor tells your, arron. _________________

Last edited by Quasi-Traction on Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:58 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, back with the results...
Jumped the ALDL, and started the car. SES light blinked rapidly till the car hit about 170F then started blinking slowly. For about a minute it switched between the two, going fast and then slow. After that it settled down and just blinked slowly. I then killed the car a couple times and restarted it, and it blinked slowly from the start each time.
Timing is at 6* btdc with no advance, but plugging the ETC plug back in pulls it way back. I'd guess it's hitting maybe 14* at idle with the ECM control.
Watched the leakdown on the fuel rail, it's worse than I thought. These numbers are with the engine hot:
Immediate: 45psi
45 seconds: 40psi
90 seconds: 30psi
2 1/2 minutes: 20psi
Seems a little fast to me, but what do I know...
Tomorrow I'm pulling the plugs to see if any of them are fouled by extra gas.
*Edit: Pulled the codes, and nothing abnormal. 12, 24, and 42. VSS is fixed now, and ETC is cause I set the timing. Vac gauge says it's pulling about 22hg of vacuum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cat and or O2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sellmanb Member
Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 727 Location: Tigard, OR
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Before you go throwing anything at the car that you speculate it needs, figure out where you're losing fuel pressure that rapidly at. Pull the rails with injectors and fuel lines attached, and watch the injectors after you pressurize (not start) the system. Find the leakers. After that's fixed you can find if you passed DEQ, or if you need to go further. With leaky injectors I've seen them eat up cats (and foul O2s) rather quickly.
All I'm saying is fix the reason why your cat and O2 probably needs replaced before you replace them  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BigDaddyVu 12sec Club

Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 1118 Location: Spokane, Wa
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| you'll get raw fuel mixture at idle if you got an aftermarket cam (cam overlap) where the the intake and exhaust are open at the same time. Can they test your car at a lil higher idle speed? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redlava Member

Joined: 02 Feb 2007 Posts: 448 Location: Bremerton
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| my vote is the cat to get past deq, I tried so many things to get my car threw that stuipid thing, non of them worked. I just ended up with a new cat and it passed with flying colors. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sellmanb wrote: | Before you go throwing anything at the car that you speculate it needs, figure out where you're losing fuel pressure that rapidly at. Pull the rails with injectors and fuel lines attached, and watch the injectors after you pressurize (not start) the system. Find the leakers. After that's fixed you can find if you passed DEQ, or if you need to go further. With leaky injectors I've seen them eat up cats (and foul O2s) rather quickly.
All I'm saying is fix the reason why your cat and O2 probably needs replaced before you replace them  |
Didn't have time to tear into the intake and pull the rail, but I did pull the plugs. I took slips of paper and slid them into each plug hole, then primed the pump and let the pressure bleed down on the rail (took less than three minutes ).
Sure enough, #6 had a dime-sized drop of gas on the paper when I pulled it. I'm going to pull the rail next to test and make sure, but I'm assuming this is the problem since it's on the passenger side and the O2 cannot adjust for it.
Ian recommended this place: http://docinjector.com/ for a rebuild. Is getting the stockers rebuilt a good idea, or would a new set of FMS or LT1 injectors be a better bet?
Also, is there any quick way to tell what type of injectors you have? If they're stockers or replacements? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sellmanb Member
Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 727 Location: Tigard, OR
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aaron, that way isnt fully accurate. Remember, the intake valve has to be open in order to have fuel get into the combustion chamber (hopefully lol) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I figured that I couldn't rule out leaking injectors by doing that, but I could probably rule them in as a the probable cause.
BTW, Sellman, would it be a better idea to put the O2 just past the Y-pipe, or would that cause it to not get hot fast enough? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sellmanb Member
Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 727 Location: Tigard, OR
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm a firm believer that O2's (and other sensors) are designed to be in specific places for a reason. Right at the collector on the manifold/header seems like the best place for it to me. You get a reading from all of the cylinders on that bank, plus having all 4 exhaust pulses run through that joining spot lets the O2 get warmer than anywhere else downstream. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|