Cascade Crew Forum Index Cascade Crew
Message Forums
 
 GarageGarage   1/4 Mile Table1/4 Mile Table   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Alright guys, now you've got me curious

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 8:32 pm    Post subject: Alright guys, now you've got me curious Reply with quote

Paul's comment the other day that a free exhaust system is going to decrease mileage got me thinking.

What I learned from my dad, and other assorted rednecks who taught me about cars was that running an open exhaust, especially headers, is going to increase mileage by way of reducing the effort of the engine on the exhaust stroke. Since you have the same cam, your valve is opening for the same amount of time, and the same amount of exhaust will exit, so you're not creating more HP, you're just increasing efficiency.

However working back-to-back split shifts two days straight (Mad) gave me some time to think about this, and it occured to me that if your exhaust was tuned well enough, pressure in the cylinder would drop to the point that more A/F mix would be drawn in on the intake stroke. That in turn would obviously cause more fuel to be used.

Paul, Rodney, is this even close to realistic, or am I way off here?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
84transam383
Banned


Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 431
Location: bend, or


PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

think of an engine as an air pump....


whatever you do to get air/fuel in faster,and more quanity of,you will increase horsepower,same with exhaust,the faster you can get the spent fuel/air out,the more power you make,and the more effiecent the motor becomes.


and i didnt read pauls comment about the mileage reducing,but when i put headers on my ram i saw a solid 1.3 1.5 mpg increase,along with the xpipe and flowmasters


it all varies thoughon a bonestock motor say,an LG4,with the horrible exhaust,you will see in increase in power/mpg no doubt,but on a complete race built motor,youll see tons of power,but probably wont see the mpg increase.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, the engine has less load on it, when it is more effecient. You would really have to do some test, because even though there is more volume that CAN be filled, it may not be, because there is less load. Really i think it would depend on the circumstances, the driver, the injection system, and how it fuels, etc.

The real question is at light cruise, are the headers actualy more effectiant, since there is less exaust flow, it could be that the stock manifolds are more effecient and scavaging the exaust.

Ok, so the truth is, without testing it out, I don't have a good answer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
BigDaddyVu
12sec Club


Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Posts: 1118
Location: Spokane, Wa

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 11:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

everbody knows you need back pressure to create HP and torque equal length headers and a cross over pipe you can always tell by the "scavanging" effect at and just off idle. free flow headers only work on High Compression "redneck blasters" monster trucks and alcohol funnies high revving enigines that go past the 14k rpm mark. I just read that article in car craft mag a couple of months ago.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Xophertony
Rodeo Queen


Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 5304
Location: Portland, Oregon.

1988 Pontiac GTA

PostPosted: Sun May 21, 2006 11:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thats all fine and good on paper. i am sticking with my 3" cat back and headers.
_________________
86' firebird (Junked in 2015). 88' GTA (sold in 2020).
aaron_sK wrote:
Hell, Tony drove his GTA to Cows a few years back with the pickup coil that came out in pieces.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BigDaddyVu wrote:
everbody knows you need back pressure to create HP and torque



Smack!

If an engine "likes" backpressure, it's because something isn't tuned to work correctly without the backpressure. Re-tuning will free up that extra power. Ask the pro and sportsman drag racers why they run open headers primarily if backpressure is "good." Back pressure is bad. What you want is a smaller pipe to increase velocity, not to the point of bottlenecking. That will help with low end.

Tell me why my motor ran 13 flat with open headers and 13.7 with full 3" exhaust and flowmaster?


The idea behind a better exhaust is that you get MORE exhaust out of the cylinder and faster(Hense your effiency) so yes... volumetric efficiency would go up. You use more of the Volume of the cylinder. If you have a restricted exhaust, the engine can't dispell as much exhaust from the cylinder as it can with a free flowing exhaust.

When restricted, there is a greater volume of exhaust still in the chamber, on the intake stroke. Free the exhaust and you free more room for the incoming charge.

More room = MORE AIR AND MORE FUEL for the SAME rpm and load.

I've put headers on 4 cars... and gotten a decrese in milage under as similar characteristics as possible for a driver to drive.


I'm sure there may be circumstances that negate this, but this is my main understanding, and experiances.

I read a few posts on Team Chevelle that say both but primarily with carbs.

Headers effect the calibration of the ECM too! Keep that in mind. Not necessarily so much with running... but top end potential AND MPG effeciency.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Twilightoptics wrote:
More room = MORE AIR AND MORE FUEL for the SAME rpm and load.


Key words. At cruise, in theory there should be less load. due to less pumping loss, and the engine being more effcient.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 8:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dewey316 wrote:
Twilightoptics wrote:
More room = MORE AIR AND MORE FUEL for the SAME rpm and load.


Key words. At cruise, in theory there should be less load. due to less pumping loss, and the engine being more effcient.


In theory. Might need some tuning to get it there though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 9:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alright. so i wasn't as completely off as I thought. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Xophertony
Rodeo Queen


Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 5304
Location: Portland, Oregon.

1988 Pontiac GTA

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

great writeup by urbanhunter44 on TGO about it. i saved the link. knew somone would need it.

http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/exhaust/338421-more-than-you-ever.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Mon May 22, 2006 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Read through that a couple times before. Good stuff, but doesn't touch the mileage question.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wanarunhard
Member


Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 125
Location: ellensburg wa


PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:47 pm    Post subject: exhaust Reply with quote

some motors especially stock ones are designed to work with backpressure becuz of valve diameter and injector sizes otherwise they run to leand and burn a valve usally exhaust valves so if you have stock motor then consider this also
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
QwkTrip
11sec Club


Joined: 17 Feb 2004
Posts: 3942
Location: Peoria, IL

1989 Pontiac Firebird

PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's no such thing as back pressure. The exhaust is going to flow in the direction of high pressure to low pressure. The further downstream you travel in the exhaust system the lower the pressure until you reach atmospheric pressure at the exhaust tips. The more restrictive a zone, the higher the pressure drop across that zone.

Given all other things equal, I would suspect that adding a well designed exhaust system to a car will increase power output and efficiency. You get the best of both worlds. If your fuel economy goes down... then you probably have a poorly matched exhaust system.

Haven't really given it a lot of thought. Just my intuition on the matter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wanarunhard
Member


Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 125
Location: ellensburg wa


PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 9:26 pm    Post subject: exhaust Reply with quote

then why have exhaust at all just run straight pipes right? then theres no pressure wouldnt that be best? why have tuned headers then like hooker and everybody else does?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
QwkTrip
11sec Club


Joined: 17 Feb 2004
Posts: 3942
Location: Peoria, IL

1989 Pontiac Firebird

PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:08 am    Post subject: Re: exhaust Reply with quote

Any time you consider air flow think in terms of pressure differential causing air flow, not air flow causing pressure differential. There's going to be a pressure drop between the cylinders and the exhaust outlet (atmospheric pressure) regardless of how the exhaust is constructed. Otherwise there wouldn't be any air flow at all. So there's pressure drop in the straight pipe too. But one type of exhaust isn't the best for all engines. The idea is to use an exhaust system that is best suited to the characteristics of your engine. But that's where things get complicated. If the engine had constant air flow then the answers would be easy to come by. But the camshaft timing and air flow characteristics of the engine add a lot of variables that make it nearly impossible to have one right answer. And if the answers were easy to come by then all exhaust kits would be identical.

Engines create pressure waves that cycle through the exhaust system each time a valve opens and closes. Tuned headers take advantage of these pressure waves to help draw air out of the cylinders. The length of each primary tube is carefully thought out so that as each exhaust valve opens there is a high pressure drop between the cylinder and the exhaust primary tube (pressure in the primary tube is as low as possible). This pressure drop helps evacuate exhaust from the cylinder. If you didn't have tuned headers then it is possible that a pressure wave from one cylinder could travel up another exhaust primary tube and hit the exhaust valve at the same time the exhaust opens. The pressure drop would be less and the exhaust wouldn't flow out of the cylinders so readily.

So what happens when the engine changes speed? The timing of the exhaust pulses changes but the speed at which those pulses travel doesn't change (It will travel at the speed of sound through that medium, and the medium didn't change - it's still exhaust gas.). This will alter the timing at which the exhaust pressure waves hit each of the other exhaust valves. Even tuned headers are only good for a particular engine speed. So again, one answer isn't necessarily good for your engine setup. You can install tuned headers but if those headers were designed to work best between 6000 - 8000 rpm then it's not a good match for your mild street engine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group